barsenault said:
GRETZKY, I just don't buy the square cap thing. I have some square caps and took some of the horrendous toning I had on some coins, opened them up, put those in a capsule, and put my newly remint coin from the perth in the square capsule. would you be able to tell? So, I guess what we need to do, is buy us some square capsules for about $.05 and put our freshly minted 1992 -1998's inside, and charge an additional $10.00 a pop, and we'll be rich? Yeah, I think you may be smok'n too much of the funny stuff. hehehe.
Then why do sellers even on this forum list square cap kooks at a higher premium than re mint round caps even when selling side by side? I know this is fact because I purchased all of my square cap kooks on this forum and avoided the re mints.
I agree that they can just simply be swapped out and I mentioned this in a thread 2 years ago, but I suggest most sellers wouldnt just swap caps out for the small gains of a single sale which most are. Some collectors are willing to pay a little more for the original and $10 is not so unreasonable given many sellers would not contemplate playing the new lamps for old game unless they had no old lamps to sell.
Also how would a re mint (94 I think?) get the original kook entire gold patina? and why are specimen coins of the same years very often cheaper and less desirable than the square cap bullion kooks? Why are original walleted Proof kooks not much more to buy than square cap bullion kooks?
I have however noticed that my square capped gold 1/10ths have cost no more to buy than round caps or even no caps.