Dogmatix
Active Member
(for Big A.D.)
http://www.abc.net.au/technology/articles/2012/11/16/3634499.htm
Basically the article says that the 'nodes' in "fibre to the node", would cost heaps of money and cause a bureaucratic mess in managing them.
Not that anyone in the article is biased or anything like that...
http://www.abc.net.au/technology/articles/2012/11/16/3634499.htm
Huge doubts cast over Coalition's 'cheaper' NBN alternative
Of the many broadband forums in the world, NBN Realized, which ran in Sydney yesterday, may not be the most glamorous. It focuses on the actual building of the network and was attended by the people who are on the ground installing cables to the houses, over and under the streets along with the people who make the cables and networking infrastructure. While no one wanted to go on the record directly, there was consensus from key players in the room: building a Fibre to the Node (FTTN) infrastructure, in terms of raw construction costs, as promoted by the Coalition, is now unlikely to be a "cheaper" option than the current Fibre to the Premises plans.
(too much to paste in here)
Basically the article says that the 'nodes' in "fibre to the node", would cost heaps of money and cause a bureaucratic mess in managing them.
Not that anyone in the article is biased or anything like that...