Pirocco
Well-Known Member
About that connection between gold and silver mentioned by user TreasureHunter:
This afternoon I was collecting US Mint data for another reason:
Silver ASE
1999 9,008,500
2000 9,133,000
2001 8,827,500
2002 10,475,500
2003 9,153,500
2004 9,617,000
2005 8,405,000
2006 10,021,000
2007 9,887,000
2008 19,583,500
2009 28,766,500
2010 34,662,500
2011 39,868,500
2012 33,742,500
Gold AGE + buffalo24k:
1999 2,055,500
2000 164,500
2001 325,000
2002 315,000
2003 484,500
2004 536,000
2005 449,000
2006 261,000 323,000
2007 198,500 167,500
2008 860,500 172,000
2009 1,435,000 200,000
2010 1,220,500 209,000
2011 1,000,000 174,500
2012 753,000 132,000
And I wondered about the remarkable differences.
Look at how volatile the AGE demand was 1999-2007. Years with double/halve amounts of other years.
Look at how stable the ASE demand was.
Look at how the ASE sales steadily increased 2008 onwards. Even last year could have added to that series without that first sales suspension.
Despite the increasing premium.
Now look at how AGE+buffalo sales steadily dropped 2009 onwards.
Delivered gold/silver is a key indicator much more important over the longer term than derivatives based purchasing.
I'm not willing to draw any conclusions yet, due to uncertainty of having complete data, but I see enough reason to wonder about that so called gold silver connection. Sure they are connected. But is it really in the degree that some seem to suggest?
This afternoon I was collecting US Mint data for another reason:
Silver ASE
1999 9,008,500
2000 9,133,000
2001 8,827,500
2002 10,475,500
2003 9,153,500
2004 9,617,000
2005 8,405,000
2006 10,021,000
2007 9,887,000
2008 19,583,500
2009 28,766,500
2010 34,662,500
2011 39,868,500
2012 33,742,500
Gold AGE + buffalo24k:
1999 2,055,500
2000 164,500
2001 325,000
2002 315,000
2003 484,500
2004 536,000
2005 449,000
2006 261,000 323,000
2007 198,500 167,500
2008 860,500 172,000
2009 1,435,000 200,000
2010 1,220,500 209,000
2011 1,000,000 174,500
2012 753,000 132,000
And I wondered about the remarkable differences.
Look at how volatile the AGE demand was 1999-2007. Years with double/halve amounts of other years.
Look at how stable the ASE demand was.
Look at how the ASE sales steadily increased 2008 onwards. Even last year could have added to that series without that first sales suspension.
Despite the increasing premium.
Now look at how AGE+buffalo sales steadily dropped 2009 onwards.
Delivered gold/silver is a key indicator much more important over the longer term than derivatives based purchasing.
I'm not willing to draw any conclusions yet, due to uncertainty of having complete data, but I see enough reason to wonder about that so called gold silver connection. Sure they are connected. But is it really in the degree that some seem to suggest?