http://goldsilver.com/new/physical-silver-surges-to-record-30-premium-over-spot-in-backwardation/
I think I'm well & truly BLOWN... (and not a little STOKED!)
:lol:
I think I'm well & truly BLOWN... (and not a little STOKED!)
:lol:
SilverNash said:I may not be reading that right but would that mean if it (the spot) goes too far down it will be raised (and i assume it would have to be a significant raise) to get us to sell our silver? In theory bonus for us?
(and if so, should we all still hold onto our silver maybe a further rise?)
Feel free to correct me if i have interpretted it wrong
Bullion Baron said:What possible reason would you have for buying this at a 30% discount instead of physical for a much lower premium?
No doubt if Sprott sells some PSLV into this premium spike the permabulls will (once again) be enraged by his sensible actions again :lol:
rbaggio said:Well Sprott must be doing something right.
Thor122 said:the last NAV premium over spot record was back in April 2011 just as silver went parabolic and the entire commodity complex experienced theinfamous May 1 takedownwhen it collapsed by $8 dollars in milliseconds on glaringly obvious coordinated intervention. Said otherwise, like back then, so now there is an actual shortage, manifesting itself in the premium. And while last time its was the price plunge which eased supply needs, we are not so sure how one will be able to spin a collapse of the current, far lower paper silver price.
Black_Sun said:a) Spend $30,000 and then store 1000 oz in your own home safe.
b) Spend $30,000 and have Sprott store 500 oz for you?
Difficult question for some.
Aengrod said:My simpleton thinking.
Black_Sun said:It was ironic that Gerald Celente got caught out by the "white shoe boys", the very same guys he has been railing against for years
Hear what Gerald has to say about those guys...
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUKCdQdxyUQ[/youtube]
Black_Sun said:It was ironic that Gerald Celente got caught out by the "white shoe boys", the very same guys he has been railing against for years
Hear what Gerald has to say about those guys...
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUKCdQdxyUQ[/youtube]
Well, not that much different from SLV then"- The Trust will not insure its assets and there may not be adequate sources of recovery if its silver is lost, damaged, stolen or destroyed
-If there is a loss, damage or destruction of the Trust's physical silver bullion in the custody of the Mint and the Trust does not give timely notice, all claims against the Mint will be deemed waived
-RBC Dexia, the Mint, the Trustee and other service providers engaged by the Trust may not carry adequate insurance to cover claims against them by the Trust.
-In the event the Trust's physical silver bullion is lost, damaged, stolen or destroyed, recovery may be limited to the market value of the silver at the time the loss is discovered
-Under Canadian law, the Trust and unitholders may have limited recourse against the Mint.
-The Trust may terminate and liquidate at a time that is disadvantageous to unitholders
-The Trust may suspend redemptions, which may affect the trading price of the units
-Unitholders will not have the protections associated with ownership of shares in an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act or the protections afforded by the Commodity Exchange Act
-The Manager and its affiliates also manage other funds that invest in physical silver bullion and other assets that may be held by the Trust, and conflicts of interest by the Manager or its affiliates may occur
-The Trust's obligation to reimburse the Trustee, the Manager, the underwriters or certain parties related to them for certain liabilities could adversely affect an investment in the units
-Unitholders may be liable for obligations of the Trust to the extent the Trust's obligations are not satisfied out of the Trust's assets"