Here's the facts you draw your own theory/conspiracy

Stoic Phoenix

Well-Known Member
Silver Stacker
In 2000 unless you lived in North Korea, Libya, Sudan, Iraq, Afghanistan Cuba or Iran your countries central bank is owned by the Rothchilds.

The USA invade Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003.
By the end of 2003 both countries central banks are under Rothschild control.

Mid 2000s UN exercise "interventions" in Libya and Sudan
By the end of 2011 both countries central banks are under Rothschild control.

Come 2012 there are three countries left - Cuba, Iran, North Korea

So whats happened over the last year?

Dec 2014 - Obama announces a changed relationship with Cuba.
Mar-July 2015 - Obama working on better relations with Iran.
Sept 2015 - North Korea says its ready to use nuclear weapons on USA. (besides popping up in the news every few months over the last few years).


Just something to contemplate......
 
Anything you are truly interested in verifying nickybaby that you cant find with a quick google search you let me know and I will post links
 
What ?
That the " De Rothchild " own just about every bank in the world :o
Old news ( to me anyway )
Black pope
White pope
queen lizzy

Enough said ;)
 
I was alluding to events of the last 15 years....and perhaps an inkling of what has potential over next 15 and where?
This would be an interesting thread for Skyrocket to research his mate Billy's works perhaps and provide info before the fact rather than after if there is any.
 
I thought Iraq and Libya were invaded because they decided to switch from the US dollar to gold for all their petrol sales...
 
Stoic Phoenix said:
Anything you are truly interested in verifying nickybaby that you cant find with a quick google search you let me know and I will post links

Missed this comment.

As long as the Internet has a link to it it must be true!

But I thought the Internet was just a false flag to discredit the world so when the Vorlons invade we won't retaliate.

I've got it on DVD, it's an old Babylon 5 episode, so it must be a fact!
 
Wasn't this a hoax from 2007?

Should I dare ask for actual factual 100% bulletproof evidence that the Rothchild's own even one Central Bank or just run with unsubstantiated conspiratorial internet rhetoric? Tough call.
 
House said:
Wasn't this a hoax from 2007?

Should I dare ask for actual factual 100% bulletproof evidence that the Rothchild's own even one Central Bank or just run with unsubstantiated conspiratorial internet rhetoric? Tough call.
I don't have , NOT GOING to look for hardcore 100% evidence :o
I want to live a little bit longer

Who do we "Australia" owe $ to
Who do most of the countries owe $
What bank ?
How come the USA has such a large line of credit ? & to who

As I have said before
I could be wrong , I have been before
And probably will be again :lol:
 
The Iron bank, they are the ones that own it all and who decide who gets credit or not. These things go back too far.

But seriously, if only we had a time machine to see how it all started and who started it all. My guess is they are not human, since their perception of time is very different to ours. We think in years, but they think in millenniums.
The biggest question to ask is why even bother? So much effort and time, and for what? Maybe there is no reason other then they can. Just like how a lot of people will spend most of their life building up worlds in a video game.

yBiIGiH6nJg.jpg
 
Bullion Baron said:
For entertainments sake, please detail exactly how the Reserve Bank of Australia is owned by the Rothchilds.


RBA is subservient to the Federal Reserve.
Federal Reserve is subservient to their member banks.
Member banks are owned by the elite (i.e. Rothschilds, etc).

"The two principal Rothschild representatives in New York, J. P. Morgan Co., and Kuhn,Loeb & Co. were the firms which set up the Jekyll Island Conference at which the Federal Reserve Act was drafted, who directed the subsequent successful campaign to have the plan enacted into law by Congress, and who purchased the controlling amounts of stock in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in 1914." (http://www.save-a-patriot.org/files/view/whofed.html)

Just like the Big4 Australian banks, aren't really Australian.
who-owns-the-big-4-banks.jpg

http://blog.creditcardcompare.com.au/big-four-ownership.php
 
Jislizard said:
I thought Iraq and Libya were invaded because they decided to switch from the US dollar to gold for all their petrol sales...

It's so hard to keep up these days!
 
"The Bank for International Settlements is the bank which sanctions the most notorious outrage of this generation the rape of Czechoslovakia."
George Strauss, Labor MP, speaking in the House of Commons, May 1939

"the Bank for International Settlements should be liquidated before it
furnished any more sinews of war to Germany, and that the odd
relationship between the British government and the Bank of England
should be re-examined without delay."
"Sees British Hands Tied on Czech Gold," New York Times, June 6, 1939

When Nazi Germany annexed the Czechoslovak border province of the Sudetenland in September 1938, it immediately absorbed a good part of the country's banking system as well as most of Czechoslovakia's strategic defenses. By then the country's national bank had prudently transferred most of its gold abroad to two accounts at the Bank of England: one in the name of the BIS, and one in the name of the National Bank of Czechoslovakia itself. (Countries had deposited some of their gold reserves in a sub-account at the BIS account in London to ease gold sales and purchases.) Of the 94,772 kilograms of gold, only 6,337 kilograms remained in Prague. The security of the national gold was more than a monetary issue. The Czechoslovak reserves, like those of Republican Spain, were an expression of nationhood. Carved out of the remains of the Austro-Hungarian Empire in 1918, the Czechoslovak Republic was a new and fragile nation. A good part of the gold had been donated by the public in the country's early years. Josef Malik, the governor of the national bank, and his fellow Czechs believed that, even as the Nazis' dismembered their homeland, if the national gold was safe, then something of the country's independence would endure.

They were wrong. The Czechoslovaks' faith in the probity of the BIS and the Bank of England was tragically misplaced. The gold was sacrificed, with barely a second thought, to the needs of transnational finance and the Third Reich.

The Nazis' first demand came in February 1939 when Berlin ordered Prague to transfer just over 14.5 metric tons of gold, supposedly to back the German currency now circulating in the Sudetenland. This was certainly an innovative idea first invade a neighboring country, annex part of it, and then demand that the newly truncated state supply the gold to pay for the loss of its territory.

The following month the question became academic. On March 15 the Wehrmacht marched into Prague. The German protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia was declared, and Czechoslovakia no longer existed. But the gold reserves did. Three days later a Reichsbank official was dispatched to the National Bank of Czechoslovakia and ordered the directors, under the threat of death, to issue two orders. Thanks to diligent detective work by Piet Clements, the BIS archivist, we have a clear picture of what happened next. The first order instructed the BIS to transfer the 23.1 metric tons of Czechoslovak gold held at the BIS account at the Bank of England to the Reichsbank BIS account, also held at the Bank of England. The second order instructed the Bank of England to transfer almost 27 metric tons of gold held in the National Bank of Czechoslovakia's own account to the BIS's gold account at the Bank of England.

Malik and his fellow directors hoped that it would be obvious that the instructions had been issued under duress and so would not be implemented. The Nazis had just invaded Czechoslovakia and would obviously target the national gold reserves. But Malik had not reckoned on Montagu Norman. The governor of the Bank of England had no interest in whether Czechoslovakia was free or a Nazi colony. "Political" considerations must not affect the BIS's transactions. The transfer order, he said, must go through.

Meanwhile, in Basel, Johan Beyen, the Dutch president of the BIS, wavered. Beyen discussed the matter with the BIS's legal adviser, Felix Weiser. But like Norman, Weiser took the most formalistic approach possible. As long as the paperwork was in order, the monies must go through. Weiser argued, somewhat bizarrely, that there could be no legal grounds to claim that the transfer order had been issued under duress, as such a plea could be brought before a Swiss court only by the persons who had acted under duress. Clearly, the directors of the National Bank of Czechoslovakia were unlikely to travel to Switzerland to present their case. Therefore any decision not to authorize the transfer would be one of BIS policy, rather than administration. The board of the BIS made policy. Thus Beyen would have to consult the board to stop the payment. (This was poor advice for another reason under the terms of the BIS statutes the Swiss authorities anyway had no jurisdiction over gold transfers between states.)

Beyen was unwilling to take a decision without authorization. But who could he ask? The chairman of the BIS board, Sir Otto Niemeyer, of the Bank of England, was traveling to Egypt and so was incommunicado. At 6 p.m. on March 20, Roger Auboin, the bank's general manager, told Beyen that the governor of the Bank of France had discussed the matter with London. The Bank of England and the Bank of France would not be taking any action to stop the transfer, because they felt that there were no grounds for action. The BIS transfer order went through.
www.amazon.com/Tower-Basel-Shadowy-History-Secret/dp/1610393813

www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-05-01/what-happens-when-you-hand-over-your-gold-bank-england-safekeeping
 
JulieW said:
"The Bank for International Settlements is the bank which sanctions the most notorious outrage of this generation the rape of Czechoslovakia."
George Strauss, Labor MP, speaking in the House of Commons, May 1939

"the Bank for International Settlements should be liquidated before it
furnished any more sinews of war to Germany, and that the odd
relationship between the British government and the Bank of England
should be re-examined without delay."
"Sees British Hands Tied on Czech Gold," New York Times, June 6, 1939

When Nazi Germany annexed the Czechoslovak border province of the Sudetenland in September 1938, it immediately absorbed a good part of the country's banking system as well as most of Czechoslovakia's strategic defenses. By then the country's national bank had prudently transferred most of its gold abroad to two accounts at the Bank of England: one in the name of the BIS, and one in the name of the National Bank of Czechoslovakia itself. (Countries had deposited some of their gold reserves in a sub-account at the BIS account in London to ease gold sales and purchases.) Of the 94,772 kilograms of gold, only 6,337 kilograms remained in Prague. The security of the national gold was more than a monetary issue. The Czechoslovak reserves, like those of Republican Spain, were an expression of nationhood. Carved out of the remains of the Austro-Hungarian Empire in 1918, the Czechoslovak Republic was a new and fragile nation. A good part of the gold had been donated by the public in the country's early years. Josef Malik, the governor of the national bank, and his fellow Czechs believed that, even as the Nazis' dismembered their homeland, if the national gold was safe, then something of the country's independence would endure.

They were wrong. The Czechoslovaks' faith in the probity of the BIS and the Bank of England was tragically misplaced. The gold was sacrificed, with barely a second thought, to the needs of transnational finance and the Third Reich.

The Nazis' first demand came in February 1939 when Berlin ordered Prague to transfer just over 14.5 metric tons of gold, supposedly to back the German currency now circulating in the Sudetenland. This was certainly an innovative idea first invade a neighboring country, annex part of it, and then demand that the newly truncated state supply the gold to pay for the loss of its territory.

The following month the question became academic. On March 15 the Wehrmacht marched into Prague. The German protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia was declared, and Czechoslovakia no longer existed. But the gold reserves did. Three days later a Reichsbank official was dispatched to the National Bank of Czechoslovakia and ordered the directors, under the threat of death, to issue two orders. Thanks to diligent detective work by Piet Clements, the BIS archivist, we have a clear picture of what happened next. The first order instructed the BIS to transfer the 23.1 metric tons of Czechoslovak gold held at the BIS account at the Bank of England to the Reichsbank BIS account, also held at the Bank of England. The second order instructed the Bank of England to transfer almost 27 metric tons of gold held in the National Bank of Czechoslovakia's own account to the BIS's gold account at the Bank of England.

Malik and his fellow directors hoped that it would be obvious that the instructions had been issued under duress and so would not be implemented. The Nazis had just invaded Czechoslovakia and would obviously target the national gold reserves. But Malik had not reckoned on Montagu Norman. The governor of the Bank of England had no interest in whether Czechoslovakia was free or a Nazi colony. "Political" considerations must not affect the BIS's transactions. The transfer order, he said, must go through.

Meanwhile, in Basel, Johan Beyen, the Dutch president of the BIS, wavered. Beyen discussed the matter with the BIS's legal adviser, Felix Weiser. But like Norman, Weiser took the most formalistic approach possible. As long as the paperwork was in order, the monies must go through. Weiser argued, somewhat bizarrely, that there could be no legal grounds to claim that the transfer order had been issued under duress, as such a plea could be brought before a Swiss court only by the persons who had acted under duress. Clearly, the directors of the National Bank of Czechoslovakia were unlikely to travel to Switzerland to present their case. Therefore any decision not to authorize the transfer would be one of BIS policy, rather than administration. The board of the BIS made policy. Thus Beyen would have to consult the board to stop the payment. (This was poor advice for another reason under the terms of the BIS statutes the Swiss authorities anyway had no jurisdiction over gold transfers between states.)

Beyen was unwilling to take a decision without authorization. But who could he ask? The chairman of the BIS board, Sir Otto Niemeyer, of the Bank of England, was traveling to Egypt and so was incommunicado. At 6 p.m. on March 20, Roger Auboin, the bank's general manager, told Beyen that the governor of the Bank of France had discussed the matter with London. The Bank of England and the Bank of France would not be taking any action to stop the transfer, because they felt that there were no grounds for action. The BIS transfer order went through.
www.amazon.com/Tower-Basel-Shadowy-History-Secret/dp/1610393813

www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-05-01/what-happens-when-you-hand-over-your-gold-bank-england-safekeeping
What. The. Fuckk.
 
Back
Top