GSR was suppose to fall according to this article...

Court Jester said:
TreasureHunter said:
They predicted a GSR to fall towards the end of this year and we're already "towards the end", not at the very end, though... and still: it's rather rising than falling.
https://www.bullionvault.com/gold-news/gold-silver-ratio-091020142

My feeling is, we'll see more GSR above 70, what if it hits 80 $? :o
Click to expand...

according to some here Silver was supposed to br $36 by easter this year as well
Click to expand...

According to others it was meant to go sideways but dropped like a sinker. We were both wrong, but in different directions.
 
tolly_67 said:
and the lesson learnt is......?????
Click to expand...

The lesson is that there is a new definition of sideways:

12844_cjsideways.png
 
sammysilver said:
Court Jester said:
TreasureHunter said:
They predicted a GSR to fall towards the end of this year and we're already "towards the end", not at the very end, though... and still: it's rather rising than falling.
https://www.bullionvault.com/gold-news/gold-silver-ratio-091020142

My feeling is, we'll see more GSR above 70, what if it hits 80 $? :o
Click to expand...

according to some here Silver was supposed to br $36 by easter this year as well
Click to expand...

According to others it was meant to go sideways but dropped like a sinker. We were both wrong, but in different directions.
Click to expand...


not in AUD im not, which is what I base my prices on
 
Court Jester said:
not in AUD im not, which is what I base my prices on

< --------- SIDEWAYS ------------ >
Click to expand...

The chart I posted earlier was in AUD. You seem to be geometry challenged.

Here it is again:

12844_cjsideways.png
 
mmissinglink said:
It's gone perfectly sideways in a sort of radically downsloped trajectory of jitteriness! :)

.
Click to expand...

The line has certainly moved from the left side of the graph to the right side of the graph, I guess that is sideways...
 
I can predict Jester's justification. He will claim "sideways" is within in a price band and applies to a longer time period so we shouldn't be looking at price moves that contradict his prediction.

Basically it is this:

Big Bang <----------- SIDEWAYS -------------> Death of the Universe
 
SilverPete said:
Court Jester said:
not in AUD im not, which is what I base my prices on

< --------- SIDEWAYS ------------ >
Click to expand...

The chart I posted earlier was in AUD. You seem to be geometry challenged.

Here it is again:

http://forums.silverstackers.com/uploads/12844_cjsideways.png
Click to expand...


no you are cherry picking date with misleading charts

start the chart at 0 and see how sideways it looks

also my definition is mid - low 20's so it is about that even now @$19.66

In that band it is effectively sideways for all practical purposes for any physical investor.
 
Court Jester said:
SilverPete said:
Court Jester said:
not in AUD im not, which is what I base my prices on

< --------- SIDEWAYS ------------ >
Click to expand...

The chart I posted earlier was in AUD. You seem to be geometry challenged.

Here it is again:

http://forums.silverstackers.com/uploads/12844_cjsideways.png
Click to expand...


no you are cherry picking date with misleading charts

start the chart at 0 and see how sideways it looks

also my definition is mid - low 20's so it is about that even now @$19.66

In that band it is effectively sideways for all practical purposes for any physical investor.
Click to expand...

Wriggling like a worm on a hook.

Big Bang <----------- SIDEWAYS -------------> Death of the Universe
 
SilverPete said:
Court Jester said:
SilverPete said:
The chart I posted earlier was in AUD. You seem to be geometry challenged.

Here it is again:

http://forums.silverstackers.com/uploads/12844_cjsideways.png
Click to expand...


no you are cherry picking date with misleading charts

start the chart at 0 and see how sideways it looks

also my definition is mid - low 20's so it is about that even now @$19.66

In that band it is effectively sideways for all practical purposes for any physical investor.
Click to expand...

Wriggling like a worm on a hook.

Big Bang <----------- SIDEWAYS -------------> Death of the Universe
Click to expand...

within the band I said it would ( or very close to _) and magnified by your misleading charts not staring at 0. You have presented your chart in a way designed to suit your own purposes, start the chart at a neutral point 0 the "wriggling like a worm) looks like a little ripple on a flat lake.
 
Court Jester said:
SilverPete said:
Wriggling like a worm on a hook.

Big Bang <----------- SIDEWAYS -------------> Death of the Universe
Click to expand...

within the band I said it would ( or very close to _) and magnified by your misleading charts not staring at 0. You have presented your chart in a way designed to suit your own purposes, start the chart at a neutral point 0 the "wriggling like a worm) looks like a little ripple on a flat lake.
Click to expand...
So we need to adjust the charts to fit your statement and to downplay price moves? Still wriggling.


Big Bang <----------- SIDEWAYS -------------> Death of the Universe
 
SilverPete said:
Court Jester said:
SilverPete said:
Wriggling like a worm on a hook.

Big Bang <----------- SIDEWAYS -------------> Death of the Universe
Click to expand...

within the band I said it would ( or very close to _) and magnified by your misleading charts not staring at 0. You have presented your chart in a way designed to suit your own purposes, start the chart at a neutral point 0 the "wriggling like a worm) looks like a little ripple on a flat lake.
Click to expand...
So we need to adjust the charts to fit your statement and to downplay price moves? Still wriggling.


Big Bang <----------- SIDEWAYS -------------> Death of the Universe
Click to expand...

irrelevant, as it is still moving within the band I predicted. even on your so called "wriggling" misleading chart.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top