Government to raise debt ceiling again

Status
Not open for further replies.

willrocks

Well-Known Member
Silver Stacker
Borrow and spend like drunken sailers. Waiting for the usual idiots to claim it's all Labor's fault.
 
SpacePete said:
Borrow and spend like drunken sailers. Waiting for the usual idiots to claim it's all Labor's fault.

Labour had nothing to do with any debt, for they are fiscal conservative's
Just ask the greatest treasurer in the free world Wayne Swan
 
753_screen_shot_2017-01-30_at_73659_am.png


https://danieljmitchell.wordpress.com/2011/10/30/mitchells-golden-rule/
 
The way this "debt ceiling" system works and still to call it debt ceiling, only proves politician must assume people are stupid.
 
That's about $20,000 for each Australian.

My new immigration policy is that each applicant must pay $100,000 for residential status.

5 million immigrants will fix our problem!
 
sammysilver said:
That's about $20,000 for each Australian.

My new immigration policy is that each applicant must pay $100,000 for residential status.

5 million immigrants will fix our problem!

Compared to the $56,000 (US $) for each American x population 323,000,000....................Our debt is AU$20,000 :) which equals to just over $15,000 US population x 24,300,000
Compared to the $13,500 (US $) for each New Zealander x population 4,470,000

How bader shape are we really in?
 
projack said:
The way this "debt ceiling" system works and still to call it debt ceiling, only proves politician must assume people are stupid.
It seems they'd be right in that assumption (silver stackers excluded of course).
 
sammysilver said:
That's about $20,000 for each Australian.

My new immigration policy is that each applicant must pay $100,000 for residential status.

5 million immigrants will fix our problem!
Non-resident holders of residential realestate should also pay a substantial annual levy.
 
SpacePete said:
sammysilver said:
That's about $20,000 for each Australian.

My new immigration policy is that each applicant must pay $100,000 for residential status.

5 million immigrants will fix our problem!
Non-resident holders of residential realestate should also pay a substantial annual levy.
WHY?
If you impart a levy all that will do is add money to the government coffers at the cost of the poor citizen that is most likely renting that residence.
If they are not resident and own properties then id say there is a high chance they are renting it out and they will just pass on any levy by increasing rent.
Yes/no?
 
Gullintanni said:
SpacePete said:
sammysilver said:
That's about $20,000 for each Australian.

My new immigration policy is that each applicant must pay $100,000 for residential status.

5 million immigrants will fix our problem!
Non-resident holders of residential realestate should also pay a substantial annual levy.
WHY?
...
Internet forum dickheads should be taxed twice as much to pay for the added psychological care amongst the general non-dickhead population.

Lighten up butthead.
 
betterinvestmentthanshare said:
sammysilver said:
That's about $20,000 for each Australian.

My new immigration policy is that each applicant must pay $100,000 for residential status.

5 million immigrants will fix our problem!

Actually if you go by GDP which is what the US debt clock is, Aussie's are 1.6 Trill in debt which equals to $68k au per head or $50k US

Compared to the $56,000 (US $) for each American x population 323,000,000
Compared to the $13,500 (US $) for each New Zealander x population 4,470,000


New Zealand................the new lucky country
 
Born in Australia.
Also have NZ citizenship.
Have a Cyprus EU identity card, though I've never been there.
My parents travelled on UK passports so I have UK patriality.

I reckon I owe $200,000.
 
sammysilver said:
Born in Australia.
Also have NZ citizenship.
Have a Cyprus EU identity card, though I've never been there.
My parents travelled on UK passports so I have UK patriality.

I reckon I owe $200,000.
As an Australian taxpayer, I will accept your payment in round 1966 fifties. Clean ones only please. :P
 
NZ is definitely worth a look at the moment I think.

For my line of work particularly the nanny state trend in Australia is deeply concerning. NZ has more libertarian laws, better foreign policy, better economic management so there are a number of reasons I am attracted beyond the bug out factor.
 
SpacePete said:
Gullintanni said:
SpacePete said:
Non-resident holders of residential realestate should also pay a substantial annual levy.
WHY?
...
Internet forum dickheads should be taxed twice as much to pay for the added psychological care amongst the general non-dickhead population.

Lighten up butthead.
Look mate i never called you a dickhead but since you pointed it out I AGREE , you should be taxed twice.
In other news if there was any doubt before it is clear now you have ZERO idea about anything money:)
 
Gullintanni said:
SpacePete said:
Gullintanni said:
Internet forum dickheads should be taxed twice as much to pay for the added psychological care amongst the general non-dickhead population.

Lighten up butthead.
Look mate i never called you a dickhead but since you pointed it out I AGREE , you should be taxed twice.
In other news if there was any doubt before it is clear now you have ZERO idea about anything money:)
:rolleyes:

FFS buddy, you spew your ignorant bullshit all over the forum. Give it a rest for a while.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top