Dutch Central Bank Orders Pension Fund To Sell Its Gold

El Bullion said:
Captain Kookaburra said:
El Bullion said:
A signal to buy more gold?

You need a signal?

Me? Yes, because I've been focusing too much on silver lately, thinking that the POG is not as easy to manipulate and will therefore not move upwards as fast as silver. :cool:


Yeh that's why I hold more gold then silver. For me gold is just like money that will hold purchasing power not as an investment that will make me rich. I focus on business to do that. I have quite abit of silver but that's the investment for gains component not preserve wealth. And as you said it's not possible to manipulate the gold market as you can with silver. A single billionaire can move the whole silver market youcant do that with gold , everyone needs to participate so it's safer
 
from Money Morning - www.moneymorning.com.au

How Much Gold

How much gold is too much gold if you're a fixed-income investor?

GOLD DOESN'T pay any income, of course. Which is why retirees and pensioners should hate it.

But since gold cannot go bust and because its tight supply typically finds strong demand when cash loses value to inflation in the cost-of-living gold in fact makes the perfect insurance for fixed-income investments like corporate or government bonds. At least, that's what 39 million gold investor Stichting Pensioenfonds Vereenigde Glasfabrieken says.

Crazy name, crazy Dutch fund managers! SPVG holds a massive 13% of its assets in gold, running a total 300m ($400m) to try and ensure a pension for workers past and present at the Schiedam, Netherlands glass manufacturer.

That compares with the typical 5% or 10% allocation which even the friendliest gold-friendly advisors might suggest. And seeing how the average European pension fund holds 2.7% in ALL commodities, never mind just gold, Holland's central bank, De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB), thinks SPVG is nuts. And so as its regulator it's given the fund two months to slash its gold position to below 3% of assets.

Good call? Not if you're holding a full 85% of your savings in fixed-income bonds, all denominated in the Euro, and primarily issued by the Dutch or German governments, says SPVG in a statement. Speaking to Investment & Pensions Europe, board member Rob Daamen picks up the story

"[The gold purchase] was a way to secure the pension fund's assets value. If we win our appeal against the instruction of the DNB [to sell] we can claim compensation for any loss we might incur."

Did you get that? A pension fund obliged by law to defend its members' savings and doing a very good job of it by all accounts bought gold to secure its asset value. It's seeking a legal decision that means it can then sue the central bank if selling down those gold holdings means the fund loses value overall.

"The decision to raise the gold allocation [doubling it in October 2009, while selling off the fund's 17% position in equities] was made in the expectation that the stock market's rise would not be sustainable and a considerable downward correction was likely to follow." Which has paid off handsomely regardless of the broader stock-market's continued gains, especially in terms of the faltering Euro which denominates pretty much all of SPVG's other investments.

Zero-yielding gold might look worthless to retirees and pension savers, in short. But if you're entirely reliant on fixed-income debt as the SPVG has become, matching its liabilities to its assets to make sure it can pay its members their pensions then it's all-the-more important to insure your savings against inflation, currency loss and default.

At least, that 's what a glass-company's pension fund in Holland believes, holding pretty much only AAA-rated government debt and stateless, debt-free gold bullion as a warranty on its members savings.
 
a clear example of a central bank that holds gold and is kicking people back into a fiat system backed by nothing
 
Back
Top