fiatphoney
New Member
Donate to wikileaks
https://shop.wikileaks.org/donate
https://shop.wikileaks.org/donate
Donate to wikileaks
- Thread starter fiatphoney
- Start date
JulieW said:
The bad thing about wikileaks is not them releasing the info they want to find. Its how they realease the rest of their whole embarassing private life with it and dont care.
If wikileaks did a police check on you juliew to find i dono?...any outstanding parking fines. They would release every single email u have ever sent, every txt message you sent your kids and wife, anything u have posted online and maybe your google searches out to the whole earth. And say.."the fines are in there somewhere, see if anyone can find them, dont worry about it, were wikileaks freedom of information!"
so we only want wikileaks to do that to people we dont like....
Wouldnt it be good if they did that to way way more people?
Lets all donate to them so it gets WAY bigger and out of hand...
Or maybe they are good RIGHT NOW because of that facts that its so small..
But if they get to out of hand its NSA complaints all over again.
We hate the NSA for taking all our info. But will donate to a organization that takes and releases anyones info as they please..
shinymetal
Well-Known Member
http://www.mostdamagingwikileaks.com/
this isn't about parking fines. this is about taking money from dictators, a public position and a private one, paying people to start violence at trump rallies, deleting 30,000 emails, taking 12 mill from the king of moroco,bribing the FBI, rigging the Palestinian election, Rigging the primaries against Bernie Sanders, Rigging media polls through oversampling... and that is just the start.
this isn't about parking fines. this is about taking money from dictators, a public position and a private one, paying people to start violence at trump rallies, deleting 30,000 emails, taking 12 mill from the king of moroco,bribing the FBI, rigging the Palestinian election, Rigging the primaries against Bernie Sanders, Rigging media polls through oversampling... and that is just the start.
shinymetal
Well-Known Member
doesn't change the fact that those things are in there, wikileaks gave the people a treasure hunt. and the people came up with the good. they weren't even that hard to find.
And if they hadn't have put the whole lot out they would be open to accusations of selectively releasing to make it look worse than it is. so they put it all out. well, they are still dripping it out, and the most shocking stuff is yet to come.
still think she's gunna win? still think she's gunna make it to election day without being arrested?
And if they hadn't have put the whole lot out they would be open to accusations of selectively releasing to make it look worse than it is. so they put it all out. well, they are still dripping it out, and the most shocking stuff is yet to come.
still think she's gunna win? still think she's gunna make it to election day without being arrested?
shinymetal said:
........ i dont think u quite get "releasing all your information" and how bad that is if we become careless or "ok" with that. U cant be that dumb, but ive read your other posts so...good chance. U dont like hillary, so your fine with it. But why would u want to show support for such a careless organization. If u start donating there will be more copycat organizations. Then morons will realise how dumb they were for supporting and letting this get out of hand in the first place. if its possible to release somones ENTIRE life, in one file to the world. And you cant see the dangers of this trend spreading. And actually support and donate for it to grow. Then i think your a moron. And when u see the repercussions of your actions, then you to will realise, that your a moron.
I expect wikileaks see their job as supplying the raw data and the newspapers and journalists job is work out what's important to the public and condense it into a story. Also, if wikileaks began removing sections they might delete something important without realising it.
shinymetal
Well-Known Member
ego2spare said:
i get where you are coming from with this. but i disagree, they don't release things willy nilly, they put out what people need to know. and i think, what they've been putting out recently, people needed to know.
if someone is running for president of the US.. and you have information on them that proves massive corruption you should show people. cos people have a right to know.
also, this email we're talking about was illegal in and of its self, it's not exactly a gmail account. it should have been .gov and it wasn't .
there is no excuse for what she did. and it is not forgivable. if it wasn't for these emails been made public.. a lot of the Clintons corruption would have passed unnoticed.
In the interests of not being selective, here is a timeline.
See how little is to do with private matters. How little is to do with the US election. How much is to do with abuse of power and government corruption.
More if you wish to be educated on what an asset Wikileaks is to the world and why the disinformation war against Assange and Wikileaks is so violent and nasty.
https://wikileaks.org/10years/distorted-facts.html
See how little is to do with private matters. How little is to do with the US election. How much is to do with abuse of power and government corruption.
More if you wish to be educated on what an asset Wikileaks is to the world and why the disinformation war against Assange and Wikileaks is so violent and nasty.
https://wikileaks.org/10years/distorted-facts.html
ego2spare said:
It's not about what is or is not relevant, and certainly not about who gets to decide which is which.
What it's about is putting the fear into powerful and important people of what everyone will see if they rise to the top of WikiLeaks' agenda: everything.