Cunning Plan Sencist

fiatphoney

New Member
What if everyone used google translate to help fill out sencist with a different language each line?

We are after all multicultural. What better way to embrace diversity globalism and group huggiestness.
 
Topherclaus said:
We're you using another language for this post or did you mean census? ;)


im going to draw a big d!ck on mine and let my 2yo daughter use it to draw on/fill out and hand it back.


im not being traced.
 
Only thing is that each paper will have some kind of code that will be traced back to each household. Like a Q-Code thingy. They are usually at the bottom of the page, black squares.

Shiny.
 
From: https://www.efa.org.au/privacy/census-2016/

2016 Changes

1. Every person's identity will remain linked to the data collected, forever.
This was imposed on 5% of the population (1 million people) in 2006 and 2011. Applying it to everybody is a massive extension first attempted in 2006, and revived in 2016

2. The data about each person, from all available Census and ABS Surveys, will be linked together.
This was imposed on 5% of the population (1m people) in 2006 and 2011.
Applying it to everybody is a massive extension first attempted in 2006, and revived in 2016

3. Additional data will be expropriated from other sources and added to each person's record.
This is new in 2016

4. Individual data about people and households will be made available to researchers.
Nominally it will be de-identified, but in practice it will be so rich that it will be readily re-identifiable.
This is substantially new in 2016. (It appears that the ABS is already doing this, without public knowledge)

5. In some cases, the individual data that is released to researchers will even include address, and "anonymised versions of names" (whatever that means).
This is substantially new or entirely new in 2016. (Possibly the ABS is already doing this, without public knowledge)

Each of these features, individually, is a gross, unjustified and unacceptable intrusion into people's privacy, and the combination of them is a serious breach of trust.

Many Australians will be so angry at these breaches of trust that the ABS's reputation is may be irreparably damaged. More importantly, there is a real danger that many Australians will choose to provide inaccurate responses or to boycott the Census altogether, thereby putting at risk the entire project and the hundreds of millions of dollars it costs to run.
 
Court Jester said:
Topherclaus said:
We're you using another language for this post or did you mean census? ;)
im going to draw a big d!ck on mine and let my 2yo daughter use it to draw on/fill out and hand it back.
im not being traced.

Self portrait!
 
According the the previous head statistician at the ABS, they will be linking our personal census record with a wide variety of data from other sources. This is a massive intelligence gathering scheme, not a census. A census is about population statistics, not individual citizens.

Unfortunately, Australian citizens will have no "control over how their personal information is handled" in the forthcoming Census of Population and Housing. The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) is collecting the name and address of each Australian, will retain that information and will match the census records with various administrative records held by government (health, tax, New Start, social security and so on). Australians will be given no say in how their information is used as the ABS has said the provision of 'name and address' is compulsory.
 
A "honey pot for hackers". The Russians might be quite interested to get all the details on OC :P


5QI7iib.jpg
 
Back
Top