SilverSanchez
Active Member
Well this is where the drill results are important.
1m @ 5.5g/t from 0m
Collate all the drill results and you will see how much of the resource is shallow - this reduces strip ration and cap-ex and lowers cost per ounce overall.
You are really waiting for the metallurgy - there is 200k ounces within 10m of surface may sound great - but if only 50-70% of that is recoverable its significantly less awesome than it first sounded. Especially if that ore needs to go through heaps of processing - washing,crushing, grinding, gravity, magnetic (this complex processing is what killed the pofitabliity of CCUs mine).
All this extra information is found in bankable feasability and definitive feasability.
Technically it could use a pullback, but volume and liquidity is low, so as long as the holders keep saying what you are (im still holding) we're ok. But if people like you get cold feet and say (nah better bank the profit now) we'll pull back. Its called Mass Psychology
1m @ 5.5g/t from 0m
Collate all the drill results and you will see how much of the resource is shallow - this reduces strip ration and cap-ex and lowers cost per ounce overall.
You are really waiting for the metallurgy - there is 200k ounces within 10m of surface may sound great - but if only 50-70% of that is recoverable its significantly less awesome than it first sounded. Especially if that ore needs to go through heaps of processing - washing,crushing, grinding, gravity, magnetic (this complex processing is what killed the pofitabliity of CCUs mine).
All this extra information is found in bankable feasability and definitive feasability.
Technically it could use a pullback, but volume and liquidity is low, so as long as the holders keep saying what you are (im still holding) we're ok. But if people like you get cold feet and say (nah better bank the profit now) we'll pull back. Its called Mass Psychology