fiatphoney
New Member
`
errol43 said:T1, was floated in 1997, first year of JWH.. elling the silverware IMO is Ok as long as you pour the monies raised back into assets.
Clawhammer said:A bit of tax reform on negative gearing (as discussed elsewhere) might save 10 billion or so as well.
trew said:nonrecourse said:A much smarter thing to do is to figure out W I I F M
Exactly. It would be much better for me if negative gearing was abolished.
Don't give a rats what it would do to your investments.
Old Codger said:Mummy did not give you enough spanks when your were a kid a couple of years ago.
OC
AngloSaxon said:Clawhammer said:A bit of tax reform on negative gearing (as discussed elsewhere) might save 10 billion or so as well.
I argue that if negative gearing (discussed elsewhere as a legitimate system of expense deductions for a business investment) were dropped, we would be worse off.
nonrecourse said:And I would not give a rats about jacking your rent up to cover the short fall from the loss of the non cash deductions![]()
Old Codger said:komrade, given that you post a fair bit in working hours, I suspect that you are the one living off the government.
Get back to me when you have paid taxes for 36 years.
JulieW said:First time since 2007. Today I had cold calls from agents looking for properties to sell.
(""it's a good time in the market!"")
Old Codger said:errol,
Like the wise man said, NEVER rely on a 74 year old brain.
:-(
(no idea on 'incorporation')
OC
AngloSaxon said:Clawhammer said:A bit of tax reform on negative gearing (as discussed elsewhere) might save 10 billion or so as well.
I argue that if negative gearing (discussed elsewhere as a legitimate system of expense deductions for a business investment) were dropped, we would be worse off. Why? Less property changing hands, less stamp duty going to the States, one of the few means States have to raise their own funds. Without stamp duty the States would cry out with their hands out for more GST, and I argue that would hurt us more than negative gearing keeping 1st home buyers out of the market - myself included!
The answer is easy. Reduce government spending. Don't do Conski or NDIS slash the rorting of the disability support payments, abolish the RBA, slash all tariffs, abolish all government monopolies, sell all government-owned businesses and property, remove all artificial labour market laws to get people back into productive work and cut all of the red and green tape you can see (a lot of which is unfortunately the purview of the states and local councils). The burden of the deadweight losses on the economy and all of the associated bureaucracy will stimulate productivity and far more sustainable wealth generation. Slash all income taxes and raise tax revenue via a national lottery.errol43 said:Peter Costello warned that Australia will probably find it much harder to get out of debt this time because of the increasing monies required for the NDIS , gonski, defence and welfare payment..The amount of people on disability pension has risen alarmingly as well as the people going onto the aged pension.
He can't see anyway out..No big assets left to sell. The silverware is gone. Raise the GST, he says will only mean that the states will spend more. Went on to say that superannuation benefits for the rich was too generous.
He was giving out this message prior to the election and he has not changed his views.
Just wait until all this extra $$ have to be found to pay for this now when we as a nation should be reducing our spending.
Now that the amount of $$$$ that can be borrowed has just gone out towards $500 billion. It won't be long now for it to get to $1trillion, then we will be in deep sh.. up to our necks.
What is the answer? If Peter Costello doesn't know, I am bloody sure I don't.![]()