Chinese Siver Guy
- Thread starter Antalon
- Start date
NO
He is full a crap , all his numbers & dates are wrong .
Chinese propaganda machine
He is full a crap , all his numbers & dates are wrong .
Chinese propaganda machine
I've started reporting all his channels
This clearly state-run AI has made huge predictions on specific dates that were garbage. It has some interesting information but even it's better if you don't watch it at all.
AG AI guy is just one of the many shrills out there be them flesh & bone or AI.
Look for those who just dissect the most recent market moves and don't push a position. Clive Thompson is about the only YT'er who just calls it as it is...Mario Innecco ain't bad either but now sponsored and "The Market Sniper" does have good technical analysis but has his own trading training school which he pumps during his vids.
Most others are connected to a trading platform or bullion dealer to buy from, so read into that what you will.
Look for those who just dissect the most recent market moves and don't push a position. Clive Thompson is about the only YT'er who just calls it as it is...Mario Innecco ain't bad either but now sponsored and "The Market Sniper" does have good technical analysis but has his own trading training school which he pumps during his vids.
Most others are connected to a trading platform or bullion dealer to buy from, so read into that what you will.
As I said in a prior post, until I see AG AI walk into a sit down interview with the likes of Peter Schiff (or someone else we know is not AI), then AG guy is sponsored shrill... just not sure who for.
Interesting, that Peorge Porras (nod to Maga Man) who screwed the UK and Asian currencies in the 1990's isn't mentioned as a player in recent PM price movement. Would seem to be his thing given past history and hatred of the West.
Sadly difficult to tell who is the real John AG!
I started with Financil Crux and then there were about a dozen imitators!
I follow this one.
I find the content educational, contrary to what others here are saying.
Last edited:
I liked the 4 part series dogging on Economic Ninja. Can't stand that guy!
Authenticity.
If you use AI to write content, then its going to match a heuristic on words, phrases and format, that signature, isnt yours.
If you use a public AI model and voice to visual your character, thats another signature that isnt uniquely yours.
Specific details that come from search, facts, and predictions are also not "owned".
SEO and platform algorithms have always had the problem of both: copycats, but also duplicates (spam)
Its easy to claim ownership of an account or site, but identifying ownership across many duplicates is a problem.
its likely that out of the (say 100) channels, some percentage are individuall copycats. Theirs also likely multiple sets of channels that are owned by a single copycat, and perhaps more than 1-2. Finally theirs the potential that some percentage of these duplicates are copies that the primary artist who compiled this style and frame has created, for reach or even as a meme fitting the narriative of a copycat for audience commitment/story in the first place.
Its just like choosing silver over paper. The "Real" thing, has aspects of security that make it superior to infinately clonable copies that mimic those attribltes. Jon AG is paper, and can be printed to infinity, also specificly lacking any real security features.
The knowlege... attribution, has counterparty risk.. theirs just no accountability.
How will you know for example if all these JonAG channels sell their acccounts to "the bad guys" for millions of $$$ ????
Theirs no difference, except when your trust leads you directly into the sheering shed.
Candy from a stranger?
If you use AI to write content, then its going to match a heuristic on words, phrases and format, that signature, isnt yours.
If you use a public AI model and voice to visual your character, thats another signature that isnt uniquely yours.
Specific details that come from search, facts, and predictions are also not "owned".
SEO and platform algorithms have always had the problem of both: copycats, but also duplicates (spam)
Its easy to claim ownership of an account or site, but identifying ownership across many duplicates is a problem.
its likely that out of the (say 100) channels, some percentage are individuall copycats. Theirs also likely multiple sets of channels that are owned by a single copycat, and perhaps more than 1-2. Finally theirs the potential that some percentage of these duplicates are copies that the primary artist who compiled this style and frame has created, for reach or even as a meme fitting the narriative of a copycat for audience commitment/story in the first place.
Its just like choosing silver over paper. The "Real" thing, has aspects of security that make it superior to infinately clonable copies that mimic those attribltes. Jon AG is paper, and can be printed to infinity, also specificly lacking any real security features.
The knowlege... attribution, has counterparty risk.. theirs just no accountability.
How will you know for example if all these JonAG channels sell their acccounts to "the bad guys" for millions of $$$ ????
Theirs no difference, except when your trust leads you directly into the sheering shed.
Candy from a stranger?