precious roar
Active Member
He's been right so far.
You're misusing the concept of globalisation.
This is what globalisation means:
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/globalization.asp
And the process has lifted the world's population to new levels of prosperity in Western nations, and slashed poverty in poorer nations. What you refer to as "globalization" is something completely different, a socio-political policy not at all linked to economics and trade. But don't let your ignorance get in the way.
As usual you are talking shit.
Before you insult people, educate yourself and think.
Globalization isn't a mere stale definition and the phenomenon doesn't just mean that, because it has tremendous negative implications: e.g. McDonald's restaurants in ancient Venice (and elsewhere) ruining the views. And not just the views.
The old, well-developed beautiful parts of Europe are being globalized.
This is driven by greed.
Globalization wipes out small businesses (hypermarkets took over, where flourishing small businesses used to be for hundreds of years)
you can see the same types of cars almost everywhere, the ugly glass buildings ruining the landscape (Manhattan is not for Europe), local foods are disappearing (everyone is eating pizza-hamburgers-kebab), local industries are disappearing because of major global corporations (and generally the great colonial powers export their industry, while the smaller countries' small industries go bankrupt or get "wiped off the table"), globalized tourism makes every destination look and feel the same (colorful houses everywhere, same bars, same services, same foods, same tour companies, same overall feel...)...
Globalization has tremendous devastating effects on Europe socially, economically, industrially, ethically, culturally...

Globalization
using USA law on Nord Stream 2 pipeline
forcing Japan to submit to US terms
now forcing China to accept
Globalization
using USA law on Nord Stream 2 pipeline
forcing Japan to submit to US terms
now forcing China to accept
Following is a translation of an article from the Global Times written in Chinese:
The trade war against China has entered fever pitch.
The White House has announced that if China wants to cease the trade war, she must meet the following 4 demands from the US government:
1. China must reduce its trade surplus with the US by US$100 billion within one year.
2. China must open up its financial and e-commerce markets to the United States.
3. China is not allowed to trade in the world markets for technology.
4. Chinese Government subsidiaries are not allowed to engage in industry policies, specifically referring to the prohibition of “Made in China 2025”.
The United States is trying to force China into signing an unequal treaty reminiscent of the Opium Wars.
These 4 demands provide the reader with a clear view of the diabolical intentions of the United States and is a conspiracy aimed at attacking China's sovereignty.
rule the WORLD![]()
According to Noam Chomsky, the US has subjected Japan to horrific economic blockades and economic warfare, literally making it almost impossible for Japan to thrive and grow economically.
Yes, this form of "globalization" is not free trade.
@sgbuyer:
"The Chinese Joan of Arc" : )))))
"The Most Powerful Woman in the World" : )))))
Taiwan was the result.
I can name at least 7 great powers that can be described as "predatory and arrogant"![]()
The world needs to come together to solve some really big problems. I'd list there the pandemic, climate change, the taxation of the global economy and dealing with some debt problems in some very poor countries. These are issues that are first-order that need a global solution, and if we're retreating from globalisation and the ability to come together, then the global economy will be weaker and Australia will be less prosperous.
Cash Empire vs Digital Currency
look ahead, digital is well ahead
cashless societies is still the future
cash is like king with a head on the floor