No1joey said:...take your negative vibes to the silver thread.
Jim Willie: Gold Headed to $18,000!
In this interview with Finance and Liberty, Golden Jackass editor Jim Willie discusses:
- U.S. Mint SOLD OUT of Silver Eagles- is this the first sign of a massive physical shortage of precious metals?
- GLD and ScotiaMocatta being drained of physical gold
- The U.S. government has ALREADY DEFAULTED on its debt; China is taking control
- How returning to a gold standard might work
- Willie's outlook on Gold- why a MASSIVE MOVE to $18,000/oz is coming
http://www.silverdoctors.com/jim-willie-gold-headed-to-18000/
Stackers stack. I've been buyingNo1joey said:So I can assume you have sold all your metals?
miniroo said:My main issue in seeing new stackers come in is they have lost the whole point of stacking PM's.
They seem to think PM's are their vehicle out of poverty, whereas PM's are meant to be a store of wealth not the creator.
You need to have wealth before you stack so if anyone thinks PM's will actually buy them a house or retirement is insane.
The rich stack gold 'cos they have a lot of money and can afford to have 10% or 15% of their wealth just sit there, like an extension of their penis for their personal pleasure, they also drink $200 bottles of wine and pay $200 for 100 grams of food on a big plate at a french restaurant.
But for young people just starting out or anyone with a mortgage or working 9-5, this is the wrong caper. sorry but the only people making money here are the ones dealing in it.
Like most things, farmers don't make much and they grow stuff, yet the supermarket selling it makes a fortune, stackers are consumers, they bare all the losses, the retailers are the money for nothing club members.
Stackers may bear losses even selling at the best of future times. Its just that stackers will lose less than everyone else. Maybe much less. Of course, if prices boom, patience will really pay off.No1joey said:Stacker's don't bear all the losses unless you buy and sell up at the two worst possible times.
A great investment in what sense? It will only be a great investment if your investment objectives are met or exceeded. That is not a given. Wait till you offload.No1joey said:Gold is not just a store of wealth but a great investment
Would you trust a gloomy bunch of pessimistic curmudgeons with their outlook on the future? Because that is what many stackers are (myself included).No1joey said:...and it may just continue to out perform a lot of other investments too. Especially with the outlook on the future.
SilverPete said:Stackers may bear losses even selling at the best of future times. Its just that stackers will lose less than everyone else. Maybe much less. Of course, if prices boom, patience will really pay off.No1joey said:Stacker's don't bear all the losses unless you buy and sell up at the two worst possible times.
A great investment in what sense? It will only be a great investment if your investment objectives are met or exceeded. That is not a given. Wait till you offload.No1joey said:Gold is not just a store of wealth but a great investment
Would you trust a gloomy bunch of pessimistic curmudgeons with their outlook on the future? Because that is what many stackers are (myself included).No1joey said:...and it may just continue to out perform a lot of other investments too. Especially with the outlook on the future.
Golightly said:Wonder if it's worth the risk of buying some unallocated gold then flicking it after vote using profits to buy physical... I think it will be a yes, mind you I thought the same for Scotland
No1joey said:...I read and I observe and I predict. And the future for gold is great.
No1joey said:You do realise that gold has outperformed the dow by more than 200% since 1970's. The only time stocks outperformed gold was during the tech bubble. So it's more than just a store of wealth. Gold is extremely versatile.
Gold Compared to Dow Jones Index
Dow Jones Index (DJIA) and Gold Nominal Prices
![]()
Gold went from $19 in 1900 to $1,110 in 2010 (times 58), while DJIA went from $61 in 1900 to $10,500 in 2010 (times 172). The first finding is that stocks investments are obviously more profitable then gold investments on the long-term. While gold average yearly return for the last 110 years was 4.91%, Dow Jones average yearly return was 6.07% in the same period. But there are periods in history, when gold strongly outperformed stocks.
Gold And Dow Jones Index Adjusted With Inflation
Dow Jones Index (DJIA) and Gold Inflation Adjusted Cumulative Returns
![]()
The point of second chart is to show you the difference between nominal and inflation adjusted growth. The thing is that prices of goods and services also rise over time and because of that, the buying power of one dollar today will be less in the future. Gold price did rose 58 times from 1900 to 2010 in nominal terms, but in real-terms, inflation adjusted growth was much lower, only 2.24 times. All the sudden gold investment doesn't look as attractive as it did before. In the same 110 years period from 1900 to 2010 the real growth of Dow Jones Index was times 5.76 (nominally 172).
Dow Jones Index (DJIA) and Gold Inflation Adjusted Annual Returns
![]()
The third chart focuses on Dow Jones Index (DJIA) And Gold Inflation Adjusted Annual Returns; gold scores 1.69% while DJIA scores 3.22% yearly. Another interesting fact can be read from the picture. The orange line, which is representing inflation adjusted gold market price, is mostly bellow the 0% line, meaning, gold growth rarely outperforms inflation; but when it does, it does it extremely. On the other side Dow Jones was a much better inflation hedge in 110 years history and it is not showing such extremes as gold market price.
http://www.stocks-for-beginners.com/gold-market-price.html
I own gold. I prefer silver. Neither provides a guarantee of future wealth. I'm not frustrated by it. Yes, I have hopes about the future price, but I also acknowledge that those hopes lead to cognitive biases so I try to look at both sides of the coin.No1joey said:"Silver" Pete, I don't how much gold you own but you clearly are frustrated by it, don't know if it's the fact you can't afford it or you just like arguing.
SilverPete said:I own gold. I prefer silver. Neither provides a guarantee of future wealth. I'm not frustrated by it. Yes, I have hopes about the future price, but I also acknowledge that those hopes lead to cognitive biases so I try to look at both sides of the coin.No1joey said:"Silver" Pete, I don't how much gold you own but you clearly are frustrated by it, don't know if it's the fact you can't afford it or you just like arguing.
The frustration here seems to be with people who highlight the possibility that there may be no guarantee that gold will turn out to be a great investment. If it is painful to contemplate such a possibility then that is a warning that emotion may be overriding judgement and cognitive biases may be in play.
When there is an outcome that you strongly hope will come about, you will be able to find facts to fit that hope and discredit counter-facts. That's what cognitive biases are all about.... the filter through which you view the world.