Yeah, he wasn't far off 'cause silver was climbing like mad a little while ago (so his claim of no resistance seems very accurate) before they knocked it down.mikedm said:Try this one mate
- At 10:00ish onwards he says JPM will make their move at 55-60 dollar silver, he says $50 will be no resistance because the $50 mark was hit a long time ago and noone has been holding for all that time waiting to get back into silver. Evidently JPM made their move a lot sooner than that. ie <$50.
mikedm said:Try this one mate
- mentions Australia at 5:00ish (Bob says if collapse of US/UK/Europe is a 10 Canada/Australia will be a 5 or 4).
- At 10:00ish onwards he says JPM will make their move at 55-60 dollar silver, he says $50 will be no resistance because the $50 mark was hit a long time ago and noone has been holding for all that time waiting to get back into silver. Evidently JPM made their move a lot sooner than that. ie <$50.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1H3fxzfyYE[/youtube]
mikedm said:I listened to Bob solidly around that time and he did mention $80 - I don't remember him saying within a few weeks, from what I remember it was a few months - he was definitely short term very bullish at the time whereas other bigger names were sensing a fall due to end of QE.
(I know he said $80 because I immediately added to my stack)
MelbBrad said:Bob=joke.
Yippe-Ki-Ya said:MelbBrad said:Bob=joke.
Only to the clueless
Nukz said:Yippe-Ki-Ya said:MelbBrad said:Bob=joke.
Only to the clueless
Actually going back to the start of this thread looks like i was right in questioning his predictions at the timethat's another one yet again your wrong with YKY it's starting to add up now
do you always back the wrong horse?
Not looking good mate, how much money did you loose out of this Chapman prediction? question still remains, was Chapman short Silver around this time as well?
MelbBrad said:Bob=joke.
geewiz said:Bob claims he has been right 98% of the time, and I believe him. The man spent decades in the gold and silver business, he knows what he's talking about.
His shorts got creamed over and over again
mikedm said:I listened to Bob solidly around that time and he did mention $80 - I don't remember him saying within a few weeks, from what I remember it was a few months - he was definitely short term very bullish at the time whereas other bigger names were sensing a fall due to end of QE.
BBQ said:mikedm said:I listened to Bob solidly around that time and he did mention $80 - I don't remember him saying within a few weeks, from what I remember it was a few months - he was definitely short term very bullish at the time whereas other bigger names were sensing a fall due to end of QE.
Thanks; if you find the link, paste it here please.
stellaconcepts said:geewiz said:Bob claims he has been right 98% of the time, and I believe him. The man spent decades in the gold and silver business, he knows what he's talking about.
Yea I wish he'd stop saying that - Cause I know for a fact he's not right that often.
And his exact words were $50 will not be a problem for silver... so he was wrong.
I like Bob as a person - I think hes genuine - but he is wrong way more than 2% of the time. He's been calling a dow collapse for the last 2 years, in every edition of his report... I know - I subscribed to it until about 1 year ago. His shorts got creamed over and over again.
He's OK - but he certainly doesn't mind fluffing up his stats a bit - if he was right 98% of the time he'd be bigger than gates, buffett, soros and slim combined. It's nonsense to even suggest that kind of accuracy.
geewiz said:stellaconcepts said:geewiz said:Bob claims he has been right 98% of the time, and I believe him. The man spent decades in the gold and silver business, he knows what he's talking about.
Yea I wish he'd stop saying that - Cause I know for a fact he's not right that often.
And his exact words were $50 will not be a problem for silver... so he was wrong.
I like Bob as a person - I think hes genuine - but he is wrong way more than 2% of the time. He's been calling a dow collapse for the last 2 years, in every edition of his report... I know - I subscribed to it until about 1 year ago. His shorts got creamed over and over again.
He's OK - but he certainly doesn't mind fluffing up his stats a bit - if he was right 98% of the time he'd be bigger than gates, buffett, soros and slim combined. It's nonsense to even suggest that kind of accuracy.
I see your point and your right if Bob means daily and weekly predictions though in my mind I thought he meant the longer term cycles..... I wonder in what context he bases his 98%