Blue Ink Spot on 1992 Kook

mrjorisa

New Member
Hi everyone,

I just received a 1992 Kook in original square capsule I got off eBay today in the mail, and found a huge blue spot on the corner of the coin. Is this normal for such coins? Feels alarming that our semi numis can develop milk spots along with blue ink spots.


BF188A10-66EA-46F4-A806-F15CDA07D092.jpg
 
the edge... circles don't have corners. :P
i've not seen it before... maybe it has had travels outside of the capsule at some stage?
 
thatguy said:
Was it advertised as having this issue?

No it wasn't. But the seller has offered to refund me so no issues there, though he said this was a common issue with Perth Mint (really?). Just disappointed really, and now afraid of it appearing on my other kooks or lunars.
 
shinymetal said:
the edge... circles don't have corners. :P
i've not seen it before... maybe it has had travels outside of the capsule at some stage?

:p haha my mind was probably confused with the square capsule. No idea why I would say corner as well now after having some time to calm down.
 
Yummy blue toning

[imgz=http://forums.silverstackers.com/uploads/16355_20150806_124558.jpg]
16355_20150806_124558.jpg
[/imgz]
 
mrjorisa said:
thatguy said:
Was it advertised as having this issue?

No it wasn't. But the seller has offered to refund me so no issues there, though he said this was a common issue with Perth Mint (really?). Just disappointed really, and now afraid of it appearing on my other kooks or lunars.
Doesn't look like toning... looks sorta like PVC plastic residue but not green enough
My bet is it did not originate from the coin or atmosphere... but who knows
 
thatguy said:
mrjorisa said:
thatguy said:
Was it advertised as having this issue?

No it wasn't. But the seller has offered to refund me so no issues there, though he said this was a common issue with Perth Mint (really?). Just disappointed really, and now afraid of it appearing on my other kooks or lunars.
Doesn't look like toning... looks sorta like PVC plastic residue but not green enough
My bet is it did not originate from the coin or atmosphere... but who knows

Do you own any of those coins?


The square capsule coins does have a layer of lacquer on them.
Over the years it came off. Some developed toning.
That for being old. If you want good conditions buy the lastest coins. Imo
 
motorbikez said:
Someone will have acid tested it for silver, that leaves a blue black mark.

dropping nitric acid on it will show blue/black if it's NOT silver.. this washes off under the tap and will leave a white colourless burn in the coin, it wont stay blue/black like that.. Looks like toning to me.
 
Golden ChipMunk said:
thatguy said:
mrjorisa said:
No it wasn't. But the seller has offered to refund me so no issues there, though he said this was a common issue with Perth Mint (really?). Just disappointed really, and now afraid of it appearing on my other kooks or lunars.
Doesn't look like toning... looks sorta like PVC plastic residue but not green enough
My bet is it did not originate from the coin or atmosphere... but who knows

Do you own any of those coins?


The square capsule coins does have a layer of lacquer on them.
Over the years it came off. Some developed toning.
That for being old. If you want good conditions buy the lastest coins. Imo

I collect kooks as part of a full set. I accept that the older coins are not going to come in mint condition, but marks like these I find hard to accept personally. As a collector, it takes away from the aesthetic appeal, and makes it a lot harder to sell it off in the future shld I wish to.

Unless people generally accept such marks on their semi numis coins.
 
Golden ChipMunk said:
The square capsule coins does have a layer of lacquer on them.
Over the years it came off. Some developed toning.

This. Try finding a 1990 Kookaburra that's in its original capsule that's worth submitting for grading. Most are blue/black afflicted from being 25 years old in non-airtight capsules.
 
mrjorisa said:
Golden ChipMunk said:
Do you own any of those coins?


The square capsule coins does have a layer of lacquer on them.
Over the years it came off. Some developed toning.
That for being old. If you want good conditions buy the lastest coins. Imo

I collect kooks as part of a full set. I accept that the older coins are not going to come in mint condition, but marks like these I find hard to accept personally. As a collector, it takes away from the aesthetic appeal, and makes it a lot harder to sell it off in the future shld I wish to.

Unless people generally accept such marks on their semi numis coins.

It depending on where the toning are.

Toning Patina Looks good on some.
Some looks Gun Metal colour which is desirable. Multi colours are good too.

Pay good money for natural occurred @ the right places.


Not all are bad.

If you collects older bars then you will know what is going on. Toning are good to a certain extent. ;)
 
goldpelican said:
Golden ChipMunk said:
The square capsule coins does have a layer of lacquer on them.
Over the years it came off. Some developed toning.

This. Try finding a 1990 Kookaburra that's in its original capsule that's worth submitting for grading. Most are blue/black afflicted from being 25 years old in non-airtight capsules.

Correct.
 
Golden ChipMunk said:
goldpelican said:
Golden ChipMunk said:
The square capsule coins does have a layer of lacquer on them.
Over the years it came off. Some developed toning.

This. Try finding a 1990 Kookaburra that's in its original capsule that's worth submitting for grading. Most are blue/black afflicted from being 25 years old in non-airtight capsules.

Correct.

hmmm, many are but not all. That kook would not be part of my collection.
Yellowing I can accept, but not much more than that. There are good condition coins out there if you're willing to pay for them.
 
Back
Top