tozak said:
Why is QRK on Wikipedia but not WDC?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cryptocurrencies
I can't find out what the total amount of WDC will be? So same speed but less secure, what would WDC have over QRK then?
I wasn't sure what tact to take with this post, so I just went with what I know enjoyed typing the most.
Wikipedia is user edited/added in case you aren't aware, so obviously the WDC shills didn't find it a priority - I highly suggest extending all future research beyond the mighty Wikipedia and try some more reputable sources.
Typing "worldcoin" into Google gives this result;
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=worldcoin
The
very first result is the Worldcoin Foundation, which has an easy to use website and makes no issue of finding the data you require.
Worldcoin is being added to BTC38 on the 6th or 7th of December according to the foundation (when speaking with them on their IRC channel). This IMO is more reliable than the trollbox rumours you have heard and believe to be a good reason to buy QRK - "
Have heard it's likely going onto BTC-e and possibly the China Exchange". I must ask, what is "The China Exchange"? BTER? BTC38? OKCoin? BTC China? etc etc etc
A WDC associated company (Scharmbeck) is already MSB registered in the USA, and due to commence WDC/USD trading pairs near the years end.
I must also point out, I have just noticed Quark has been removed from coinmarketcap.com, in past experience the only reason this is done is either because the coin is 99% dead, or the devs are trying to hide the total number of coins/market cap from those too stupid to look elsewhere. Granted there may be a good reason, but I am struggling to find it.
Max Keiser and Bill Still are pumping Quark for their own gains, no one elses.
edit: I own neither WDC or QRK, my point is more than there are over 100 coins out there and QRK isn't anything special.