H
House
Guest
OC, 5 years later... http://forums.silverstackers.com/message-135187.html#p135187
Completely wrong of course. You have conflated short term growth with long term preservation. Gold can obviously decline in value relative to fiat or various physical assets, but as a store of value though economic and societal meltdowns it has few equals. An ounce of gold 500 years ago is an ounce of gold today. There are plenty of examples of other so called assets that are worth nothing today.malachii said:Gold and silver are not historically a good long term store of wealth. They work for short term but not longer periods of time. If you want real examples have a look at what an oz of gold and silver could buy you historically and what it can buy you now.
malachii
Old Codger said:As they often say, Gold is the only REAL money, all the others are just promises on a bit of paper.
OC
House said:Old Codger said:As they often say, Gold is the only REAL money, all the others are just promises on a bit of paper.
OC
And gold is the promise of... a tiny lump of metal?
Old Codger said:No, when an ounce of Gold is worth 100 TRILLION Australian dollars, I know who will be able to BUY food while you cannot!
Your family will starve, and mine will eat!
YUM!
Let them eat cake!
OC
Skyrocket said:House said:Old Codger said:As they often say, Gold is the only REAL money, all the others are just promises on a bit of paper.
OC
And gold is the promise of... a tiny lump of metal?
Gold is not a promise but a precious metal that always worth something. Money is a promise.
SpacePete said:Completely wrong of course. You have conflated short term growth with long term preservation. Gold can obviously decline in value relative to fiat or various physical assets, but as a store of value though economic and societal meltdowns it has few equals. An ounce of gold 500 years ago is an ounce of gold today. There are plenty of examples of other so called assets that are worth nothing today.malachii said:Gold and silver are not historically a good long term store of wealth. They work for short term but not longer periods of time. If you want real examples have a look at what an oz of gold and silver could buy you historically and what it can buy you now.
malachii
House said:Skyrocket said:House said:And gold is the promise of... a tiny lump of metal?
Gold is not a promise but a precious metal that always worth something. Money is a promise.
Explain.
House said:I meant you explain it, not a copy paste job.
SpacePete said:Completely wrong of course. You have conflated short term growth with long term preservation. Gold can obviously decline in value relative to fiat or various physical assets, but as a store of value though economic and societal meltdowns it has few equals. An ounce of gold 500 years ago is an ounce of gold today. There are plenty of examples of other so called assets that are worth nothing today.malachii said:Gold and silver are not historically a good long term store of wealth. They work for short term but not longer periods of time. If you want real examples have a look at what an oz of gold and silver could buy you historically and what it can buy you now.
malachii
Old Codger said:No, when an ounce of Gold is worth 100 TRILLION Australian dollars, I know who will be able to BUY food while you cannot!
Your family will starve, and mine will eat!
YUM!
Let them eat cake!
OC
House said:You will be long, long gone before an ounce of gold is worth 100 trillion anything.
malachii said:Would the ounce of gold still purchase the same amount of land, food, protection, clothing etc 500 years ago than now?