auspm said:I have absolutely no sympathy for those who are about to burn.
None.
Especially if they are the most vocal critics of the few who are preparing for the worst.auspm said:It's reality.
I have absolutely no sympathy for those who are about to burn.
None.
mickjohn said:Interesting follow up.
Is the trader from hell actually a hoax.....
http://www.news.com.au/business/get...arns-bbc-viewers/story-e6frfm1i-1226148440353
mickjohn said:Interesting follow up.
Is the trader from hell actually a hoax.....
http://www.news.com.au/business/get...arns-bbc-viewers/story-e6frfm1i-1226148440353
Psyops 101........ damage the credibility of a messenger in order to subvert the message (irrespective of the veracity of the message content).auspm said:mickjohn said:Interesting follow up.
Is the trader from hell actually a hoax.....
http://www.news.com.au/business/get...arns-bbc-viewers/story-e6frfm1i-1226148440353
He certainly could be a shonk, but that doesn't mean his message is wrong. But if you can attack the credibility of the source, you can denounce the credibility of the information.
THAT is the real agenda of this article.
luckylukeonline said:Psyops 101........ damage the credibility of a messenger in order to subvert the message (irrespective of the veracity of the message content).auspm said:mickjohn said:Interesting follow up.
Is the trader from hell actually a hoax.....
http://www.news.com.au/business/get...arns-bbc-viewers/story-e6frfm1i-1226148440353
He certainly could be a shonk, but that doesn't mean his message is wrong. But if you can attack the credibility of the source, you can denounce the credibility of the information.
THAT is the real agenda of this article.
+ 1auspm said:Posted here on SMH as well :
http://www.smh.com.au/business/worl...rules-the-world-uk-trader-20110928-1kvv4.html
Interesting to note that some articles SMH posts they allow reader feedback/comments
But on others where they want to have the only say on a message, they don't allow it.
Usually reserved for smear campaigns like this and RE spruiking 'news articles'.
The Australian media is very insidious with it's subtle propaganda like this. Give people the right to contest openly only on the articles they don't give a damn about... block the rest.
Gives the illusion of being open and unbias, when really controlling the information flow.
Interesting psychology behind it if you are interested in that sort of thing.
systematic said:it was interesting that he was recommending people to protect their savings
wish he had spoken more on that
temporarily safer asset I think, or best of the worst, or place to store ammo for futurechimpanchu said:What the heck? Is that guy on video implying that people should be buying 30 year bond to protect their wealth????? Because 30 year bond is "safer" asset?
thatguy said:temporarily safer asset I think, or best of the worst, or place to store ammo for futurechimpanchu said:What the heck? Is that guy on video implying that people should be buying 30 year bond to protect their wealth????? Because 30 year bond is "safer" asset?