I can understand the frustration. And if they produce say 100,000 of the 300,000 within the first year I can see when one would assume that they would produce no more. But at a cap of 300,000 coins means you should expect 300,000 coins to be produced, whether they are produced within the 12 months or 20 years later.
I do also have sympathy for the collectors, it would suck to know your coin is being re-produced later down the road in a better case and without toning. But at the end of the day they have the right to produce upto 300,000 1992 kooks. And 20 years later tehy are filling that quota. Still BS I reckon.
I guess it sort of the 'read the fine print' situtaion, like all those people who got flood insurance in QLD and then werent able to claim cause the fine print didn't define it as a flood.
I do also have sympathy for the collectors, it would suck to know your coin is being re-produced later down the road in a better case and without toning. But at the end of the day they have the right to produce upto 300,000 1992 kooks. And 20 years later tehy are filling that quota. Still BS I reckon.
I guess it sort of the 'read the fine print' situtaion, like all those people who got flood insurance in QLD and then werent able to claim cause the fine print didn't define it as a flood.