AMERICA UNDER ATTACK!!!

If I may summarise this thread...

Alex Jones is generally considered one of the good guys, but his delivery is not everybody's cup of tea.
 
Haggai 2:8 said:
If I may summarise this thread...

Alex Jones is generally considered one of the good guys, but his delivery is not everybody's cup of tea.

I would say that was about right.

Alex Jones is the Steve Irwin of conspiracy, very passionate, larger than life, makes a lot of noise and popularises the issues, brings it to a new audience etc. but if I want to learn about snakes I'd watch a David Attenborough show.
 
Alex is as entertaining as any of the shock jocks in his own way and he is playing to the lowest common denominator and aiming for the grass roots awareness it seems to me. The sort of people who will put money in envelopes for TV evangelists.

At least Alex Jones is offering an alternative view of history for them to consider. The same way that Lindsey Williams talks to an audience at 12 year old level. These people know just how uniformed and trained into unthinking obedience most of their audiences are. Some of Alex Jones' documentaries I think are very well done, and when he assumes his demagogue role play he's nigh on unbearable in my opinion, still I regularly check his website and occasionally listen to an interview since there are very few news services that cover his material - although now, RT News and Capital Account (you tube) provide my primary news.

But you have to keep an open mind to all sources, even the Bilderberg Illuminati controlled mind control slaves of the television Networks, after all if they're in the game they've already lost their integrity.

In 1976 it was this way in the film Network.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WINDtlPXmmE[/youtube]

and now it's too late.
(perhaps the Illuminati warned us! :) )

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxiT30N6ti4[/youtube]

They were so unconcerned about giving the game away they even gave it an Oscar.

and in 1997 they showed what was next:
A fake media spectacle to start a fake war after a president loses office after having sex with an intern.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxfThO_oGo0[/youtube]

Roll on Alex.
 
I love AJ. I'm very thankful for his presence and his passion, he's woken many people up.

He does exaggerate a bit however. An example was when he said that in high school he punched a bullies nose off. He said "it came off, there was just this black hole with blood spurting out. It was wild" ..... (It probably landed in a teachers cup of coffee :lol:)
 
Ernster said:
We should be thanking people like Alex. He is one of a kind and in the end even though he is crazy he makes it entertaining! Wouldnt you be crazy and ultra paranoid if you did what he did 10 hours a day for 20 or so years he has been doing this?

I think he has proven himself to right about many things that have come to pass.

I go through periods where I'm addicted to show and other times I try and stay away. But in the end when you are "awake" you can't fight it, and we always come running back.

I will say one thing I don't like is how he pushes his Tangy Tangerine vitamins when I'm quite they are just synthetic and not all natural like he claims.

I did research on the youngevity products founded by Doctor Wallach. I trust them. Though I kind of see what you mean, all of the ingredients are not listed on the Tangy tangerine (i've bought a few tubs) personally i'd go with something like vitalgreens, vitamineral green or Boku superfood. Youngevity products are good for their plant derived minerals.
 
Geewiz I've seen a few sites state that any supplements that have Vitamin "X" with a name beside it which all of Tangy Tangerines label shows, means they're synthetic vitamins. These sites do say the names which match up with what the TT label says.

Personally I'm not willing to risk my health.

I think just eating a lot of real vegetables and herbs should be good enough, even thought I know Dr Wallach says you can't get everything from them. However if they really are synthetic vitamins then we can't really trust what he says in the first place.
 
Jislizard said:
Barbarian At The Gate said:
So let me get this straight: you believe the message but hate the messenger?

I have no problem with the message, I have heard it before, I have read about it before, it's not as if Alex Jones invented Bilderberg.

I don't know Dan Rather so I don't know if I would prefer him, does he foam at the mouth? If not, then I probably would.

The messenger's job is to spread the message. If, while spreading the message, he comes across as being crazy, then people assume the message is also crazy. By the very act of opening his mouth he is actually making some people stop listening to the message.

We don't need to convince conspiracy theorists, we need to convince the sheeple, and you can't do that by shouting at them, you need to be calm and let them know the message is valid. If Alex Jones's delivery was conducive to people listening, then every TV and Radio advert would sound like an Alex Jones rant, but they don't because he doesn't wake people up, he makes them switch channels.

He makes the message a laughing stock and the people who listen to him come across as being a bit rabid, no offense...

Barbarian At The Gate said:
And if you don't believe the message, then explain the creation of FEMA camps, false flags (Aurora, Fast and Furious) designed to confiscate peoples' guns, the procurement of 1.5 billion hollow point bullets and counting (enough to fill 63 olympic-sized swimming pools), foreign troops on US soil plus joint Russian/US training drills, thousands of drones patrolling US skies, armored tanks and vehicles being rolled out across the country, the abolishment of the rule of law as it applies to crooked bankers; non-enforcement of those laws as applied by the US Justice Department, run by an equally crooked Eric Holder?

As I already stated, I do believe the message, so the rest of your Alex Jones style rant was unecesary and to tell you the truth, I stopped reading it aout a third of the way through!

Given the state of apathy and and rate of plain ignorance of the populace out there i'd have to say that 'ranting' is the right thing to do!
 
Yippe-Ki-Ya said:
Given the state of apathy and and rate of plain ignorance of the populace out there i'd have to say that 'ranting' is the right thing to do!

I also feel the urge to rant, on many topics but it can be counterproductive, so I reserve it for internet forums where it doesn't really matter.

If you want to raise awareness of an issue then I would say it was an effective method. You have to be heard above the Main Stream Media.

If you want to communicate information about an issue then I would say it is less so.

When you look at most businesses which rely on communication to operate, main stream media, advertising, education, customer services etc. they tend to shy away from ranting as a means of communicating with their clients. Sure you get your shock jocks and your newspaper column writers but they are usually considered 'entertainment' rather than serious journalists.

"If you don't read the newspaper, you're uninformed. If you read the newspaper, you're mis-informed." Mark Twain

To the best of my knowledge, Mark Twain never claimed to have punched a guy's nose off
 
Back
Top