Ronnie 666 said:
dccpa said:
Care to list any sources that state insured amounts have been or will be touched? In the US, those of us with accounts under $250k are ok. I will let the rich guys worry about losing some of their savings under a bail in plan. Personally, I will take a highly unlikely potential loss over a sure loss.
You are not serious are you ? The US FDIC will cover deposits under $250 k. The problem is that the FDIC Fund has a grand total of .......$25 Billion with a line of credit to the Fed of another $130 Billion to cover a total of $9 T+ of deposits ,,,,,,hahaha It will save a small bank failure but any systemic crisis and you are screwed. If you feel safe with the FDIC insurance you need to seek psychiatric help, because you are deluded.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-...rance-9283-billion-deposits-297514-billion-de
That still doesn't mean that metals preserve the purchasing power you had when you paid too much for them, Ronnie 666. If one pays a price that later halves (relative to other products), and then the price doubles and the other products double too, then that one still lost half the purchasing power he had when he bought the metals.
Tell me then, what's the difference between this loss, and a 50% haircut like for ex in Cyprus?
This makes clear that the risk you see within the banking system deposits, exists as well in precious metals.
Also, saving in a certain product, is speculation, with dollar and silver just being two examples of speculation.
Some people speculate on the dollar to save, others speculate on silver. It's not the product / the metal itself that makes a speculation succesful, but the price-related risk on the moment of the speculative act.
So both dccpa and you can be right, depending on the price risk of the dollar, or silver, on the moment of the statement.
Take for example silver over the last decade. The price is now 4 times the price of abit over a decade ago. A couple years ago, it reached even 10 times.
Did other prices also quadruple over this decade?
Silver might have had some catchup to do, since it has had a flat price for 2 decades earlier, while other prices doubled.
And yes, serious inflation can pop up. But as illustrated above, it doesn't affect only silver so if you paid a doubled price above the inflation decades trend, then you still lost half the purchasing power you had.
That decades fiatcurrency inflation trend manifest itself in other markets along fluctuations, which are caused by errors made by a part of the speculating masses, with the other part exploiting them. This risk on loss is as big as the fiatcurrencies / bank deposits risk on loss.
And I'm sure you know this all. So I've to bounce the question back: are you serious yourself haha?