Phil_Stacker
New Member
Lucky there is no such thing as inflation, which means inflation adjusted figures would need to be used to compare like with like.
Oh, wait, there were such a thing as inflation, and these graphs didn't take that into account... so the net present value (or net past value) - a.k.a. inflation adjusted value would compare like with like.
Okay - that jab aside, the graphs are somewhat compelling (because interest rates have been low and timeframes short). The building approvals is also an interesting graph. But what's it telling me? That house prices are high? Is that manageable? If not, who is at risk?
What's more important is % default and % of income going to pay debt (not %change in % of income ratio).
Increased defaults and increasing sustainability debt to income lead to the global financial meltdown, but even then only because "everyone" was exposed, were-as now just over-extended house owners and banks (and therefore super funds and many stock indexes) are affected. Not everyone, and not predictive of an economic crash.
What the final graph shows is people are building new houses... at an stable rate.... that sounds "sustainable", except for the very last "blip" which has occurred at roughly the same time every year. So again... what's the point of that graph again?
I think the housing market is a bubble, but I don't see any proof of that above.
I'd be far more focused on the effect of OPEC decision, and jobs figures due Friday then any of the figures above.
Oh, wait, there were such a thing as inflation, and these graphs didn't take that into account... so the net present value (or net past value) - a.k.a. inflation adjusted value would compare like with like.
Okay - that jab aside, the graphs are somewhat compelling (because interest rates have been low and timeframes short). The building approvals is also an interesting graph. But what's it telling me? That house prices are high? Is that manageable? If not, who is at risk?
What's more important is % default and % of income going to pay debt (not %change in % of income ratio).
Increased defaults and increasing sustainability debt to income lead to the global financial meltdown, but even then only because "everyone" was exposed, were-as now just over-extended house owners and banks (and therefore super funds and many stock indexes) are affected. Not everyone, and not predictive of an economic crash.
What the final graph shows is people are building new houses... at an stable rate.... that sounds "sustainable", except for the very last "blip" which has occurred at roughly the same time every year. So again... what's the point of that graph again?
I think the housing market is a bubble, but I don't see any proof of that above.
I'd be far more focused on the effect of OPEC decision, and jobs figures due Friday then any of the figures above.