A study of 2oz Engelhard Australia bars

goldpelican

Well-Known Member
Silver Stacker
A study of 2oz Engelhard Australia bars

Recently I received a lot of the new 2oz Engelhard Australia bars for my personal stack. After a discussion with the distributor regarding the process of getting these bars produced, I did some sorting and research on the bars at my disposal, and have identified FOUR varieties amongst these bars that makes for interesting collector information.

Firstly, 1000 bars were serialised after delivery from the original foundry with unique serial numbers (more on that later!), before a commercial decision was made to cease stamping the bars with serial numbers. Presumably the range of 00001 to 01000 was stamped on bars - I received a mix of bars from the 200s through to the 500s. The way these bars are manufactured (they are cast, then pressed) results in some non-uniform shapes, making the stamping process difficult. The bars have the normal "ENGELHARD AUSTRALIA" stamp on the front, same as the 5oz and 10oz bars already in distribution, and on the back, they feature a two line stamp "999+ SILVER" "2 TROY OZ". Now once the bar has been stamped with those initial stamps, it appears that the silver bar "work hardens", and the bar is slightly deformed into the unique shapes seen on every bar. The subsequent hardening of the silver from the initial stamping, and the non-uniform surfaces, made serialising the bars as a separate step very difficult, resulting in many misstrikes that were culled, and non-uniform serial number impressions. The commercial decision was made to discontinue serial numbers after the first 1000 bars were stamped, so there are a potential maximum of 1000 serialised bars available in the 2oz size. The rest of the bars produced to date and in future will not be serialised.

Another difference that was noted was that on some bars, it appears a different stamp was used for the weight stamps on the back of the bar. Some bars feature "2 TROY OZ" as a single stamp, on others, it is apparent that there was one stamp used for "TROY OZ", and the numeral "2" for the weight was done as a second stamp, probably with a bar serialisation stamp set to "2" followed by blanks, as some bars show evidence of the edges of the blank digits (see photo of Type 1 bar - there are horizontal stamp edges above and below the word TROY). This separate "2" stamp is a different font - the word letters are uniform with a flat relief, while the "2" stamp looks like a mildly narrower font, with a "V" profile on the stamp, making it more a incised impression. Side by side they are very different. Also the placement of the "2" stamp is inconsistent - some are almost perfectly in line with the words, others are very much out of alignment. At some point the foundry gave up on stamping the bars multiple times, and introduced the combined stamp for a single uniform strike.

Both the single stamp and double stamped varieties have been observed with and without serial numbers - the change from separate stamps to a single stamp happened in the first production run. As the serial numbers were applied after receipt by the distributor, not at the original foundry where the Engelhard stamp is applied, it was not initially noticed that there was essentially two versions of the back of the bars, and serial numbers were inadvertently applied to bars with both back types. From the consecutive runs I have though, it appears that the first 500 serial numbers were applied to bars with the separate digit and word stamps, and the next 500 serial numbers were applied to bars with the single combined stamp. Even then, I've randomly found in the middle of some runs a very limited number where this has been reversed - I have a few consecutive pairs featuring the separate and combined stamps on the back - which allows for the collection of two varieties with consecutive serial numbers! Out of 200 serialised bars, I've only found four pairs like this, so it is very scarce. I have a single bar with a 500+ serial number featuring the separate stamps on the back, but it's an orphan, I do not have the consecutive numbers on either side of it.

Now lastly, these bars were serialised on a machine that requires the serial numbers to be advanced by hand between each stamping - much to the distributor's chagrin I found a duplicate serial number - 00421 appears twice, absolutely by error. So I have a run of four bars with the serials 00420, 00421, 00421, 00422. The distributor has confirmed that this is an error, and it is likely to be unique, overlooked during the rather manual serialisation process. Separate serialisation of bars on hand operated machinery is a common industry practice for stamped serial numbers - I've witnessed this taking place in two different refineries.

So we have four proposed types for the new 2oz Engelhard Australia bars:

Type 1 - separate stamps for the digit "2" and the words "TROY OZ", no serial number. Presumed out of production, population unknown but likely in high hundreds or low thousands (130 observed).

Type 2 - combined stamp for the phrase "2 TROY OZ", no serial number. Current production style, population in thousands and growing.

Type 1S - separate stamps for the digit "2" and the words "TROY OZ", with serial number. Out of production, population estimated 500 (172 observed).

Type 2S - combined stamp for the phrase "2 TROY OZ", with serial number. Out of production, population estimated 500 (29 observed).

To date we are only aware of single varieties in the 5oz and 10oz sizes. All of those bars have serial numbers to my knowledge.

Might be a research project for the forum to continue to identify the approximate number of Type 1S vs 2S in circulation. Known ranges (based on my observations and subsequent contributions to this thread):

001-250: Unknown, surmised to be Type 1S
251-399: 1S
400-401: 2S
402-408: 1S
409: 2S
410-436: 1S (includes duplicate 421)
437: 2S
438-499: 1S
500-594: 2S
572,588,595: 1S
596+: Unknown, surmised to be Type 2S

Known pairs/triples:
399/400 (1S/2S)
401/402 (2S/1S)
408/409/410 (1S/2S/1S)
436/437/438 (1S/2S/1S)
570/517/572 (2S/1S/2S)

Also the unique:
421/421 (duplicate 1S)

500/501 were not supplied, and there were some gaps in the sequences above, but overwhelmingly, bars 250-499 are 1S except for 4 bars, everything over 500 is 2S except for a single bar. There's 800 other serialised bars out there I have not seen that will need to be researched if there's interest in knowing more accurate population numbers for collector purposes - I only have a few bars over #500, it may actually be that 2S is rarer that 1S if a significant run of 1S bars higher than 500 turns up. As these bars are quickly being "scattered to the winds" as distributors take delivery and make sales, we may never know. In the meantime, if you're an Engelhard afficionado, I suggest now is a good time to jump on any supplies of serialised 2oz Engelhard Australia bars, and look for what's possibly ultra-rare 1S/2S consecutive pairs before they all get broken up! As someone with a pecuniary interest in a reseller of these bars, I doubt staff will take the time to hand-sort bullion bars looking for such pairings, so it will be a luck of the draw.

I don't mind maintaining a list of type exceptions in the thread to help determine rarity - if you find a serial number in a range not listed (e.g. below 250 or over ~600), please post the type - and if you find an exception (e.g. a 2S in the 250-499 range), post it as well as if you have a consecutive pair for it.
 

Attachments

  • 2oz_engelhard_type_1.jpg
    2oz_engelhard_type_1.jpg
    98.2 KB · Views: 21
  • 2oz_engelhard_type_2.jpg
    2oz_engelhard_type_2.jpg
    463 KB · Views: 20
  • 2oz_engelhard_type_1s.jpg
    2oz_engelhard_type_1s.jpg
    484 KB · Views: 20
  • 2oz_engelhard_type_2s.jpg
    2oz_engelhard_type_2s.jpg
    486.6 KB · Views: 19
From my 40 bars:5 bars under 500 & 35 bars from 501-578.

5 bars 490-498: 1S
2 bars over 500 were 1S
33 bars between 501-578: 2S
Only one 1S/2S Consecutive pair
An interesting bar was serial 555 which has a double stamped serial number.
In that lot I recieved consecutive:
2 runs of 4
2 runs of 3
3 pairs
 
Is it not just bad quality control or bad manufacture process control of a new style silver bar ?
 
ultimacash said:
From my 40 bars:5 bars under 500 & 35 bars from 501-578.

5 bars 490-498: 1S
2 bars over 500 were 1S
33 bars between 501-578: 2S
Only one 1S/2S Consecutive pair
An interesting bar was serial 555 which has a double stamped serial number.
In that lot I recieved consecutive:
2 runs of 4
2 runs of 3
3 pairs

Thanks - can you post the serial numbers of the 1S bars over 500, and what the 1S/2S pair was? This thread will help build provenance.
 
No worries
1S bars over 500 were numbers: 572 & 588
The consecutive pair 1S/2S numbers: 571 & 572
I also have bar 570 so its a run of 3 actually.
 
I was waiting until today for funds to add some to my pb order (already have 10) called up before and they are all out it would seem!! My engelhard is broken. No more for me.
 
Considering the value is in the silver rather than in the product, and "correcting" these issues requires sending back through the manufacturing process, it's probably best characterised as "teething" issues. The refinery found that using 2 stamps wasn't really working, so they changed: problem solved undoubtedly from their perspective. Then Engelhardt (or whoever was whacking numbers on them) found that it really wasn't working and gave it up as a bad joke. Customer gets the right amount of silver, so no-one suffers and no point in re-manufacturing.
And collectors get some rarities to collect.
All good :)


fishtaco said:
Is it not just bad quality control or bad manufacture process control of a new style silver bar ?
 
The intrinsic value is in the silver.. But you bet cha the numbered bars are going to have a collector over the unumbered ones.. For instance..
Would anyone like to sell me 15 of your numbers bars for $1.50 more than listed for singles? Buy back in numbered ones and make a profit.
Or same offer for anyone. :)
Oh damn.. Showing my skills is reading something thru entirely before commenting!! Haha if I got to the last line I would have seen the bit about collectors having something :p
However offer still stands. If anyone wants to flip their bars for a few bucks more each than paid. ;)
 
So what's stopping anyone stamping numbers on unnumbered ones themselves. Simple number punches and a hammer from Bunnings should suffice.
 
It looks like all 5 didgets in the serial are on one press.. Not 5 numbers punched on one at a time.. You would see the difference ... It would be doable if you were the scaming type. But would require some kind of rotating 5 number stamp.. That might be more trouble than it's worth :p
 
shinymetal said:
It looks like all 5 didgets in the serial are on one press.. Not 5 numbers punched on one at a time.. You would see the difference ... It would be doable if you were the scaming type. But would require some kind of rotating 5 number stamp.. That might be more trouble than it's worth :p

Bit of a botch job on the numbers on these bars to start with. The strikes have been hit with different forces to begin with. So not really a problem for a scammer. I've struck thousands of letters and numbers in my life. Not difficult. Even a beginner could route out a simple wood mold to align the numbers. But really, its more trouble than it's worth as I can't see any collector value in these. Looks to me it's a contrived collectible rather than a real collectible that develops real value and rarity over time.
 
I guess we'll see over time eh!
I tend to disagree.. Maybe contrived. But there is certainly a market for engelhard poured bars.
Good thinking about a mould to put the numbers in thou :p giving peeps ideas!!
 
Huge fan of Engelhard. Have had the pleasure of collecting and reselling many of their old school products over the years. As a collector, I don't consider the new Australian Engelhard bars to be collectible. Not trolling. How could I troll my own post which I uploaded and had asked you to delete. Just offering a alternative opinion Not a fan of these bars. And I believe many old school Engelhard collectors would agree. Can't make a silk purse from a sows ear.
 
Back
Top