mmm....shiney! said:nowaydude said:Black_Sun said:Other types of commodities (eg. wheat, cotton, sugar, etc).
lol lets all grow money out of the ground
I know it's been posted before but:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pDTiFkXgEE[/youtube]
nowaydude said:wheat/cotton/sugar cannot be used as money/medium for trades. Sure, people can barta - but it has its limitations. Here we all are complaining about hyperinflation and QE, imagine if everyone in the world starts growing wheat - hyperinflation of wheat!
Black_Sun said:nowaydude said:wheat/cotton/sugar cannot be used as money/medium for trades. Sure, people can barta - but it has its limitations. Here we all are complaining about hyperinflation and QE, imagine if everyone in the world starts growing wheat - hyperinflation of wheat!
This is an old proposal, and these days its also suggested by "hard-money gold-bug men" (Austrian school) some of whom have been interviewed by Eric King. Some of these people are leading thinkers, so I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss it. Its simply not true that a commodity basket can only be comprised of things from the mineral kingdom.
nowaydude said:Black_Sun said:nowaydude said:wheat/cotton/sugar cannot be used as money/medium for trades. Sure, people can barta - but it has its limitations. Here we all are complaining about hyperinflation and QE, imagine if everyone in the world starts growing wheat - hyperinflation of wheat!
This is an old proposal, and these days its also suggested by "hard-money gold-bug men" (Austrian school) some of whom have been interviewed by Eric King. Some of these people are leading thinkers, so I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss it. Its simply not true that a commodity basket can only be comprised of things from the mineral kingdom.
like i said, i dont doubt that they have value, and obviously i think theyre a commodity - but they cannot be money. if the US were 15000000000000 grains of wheat in debt, theyd grow it. that is worst then fiat currency - ANYONE can grow it.
Black_Sun said:nowaydude said:Black_Sun said:This is an old proposal, and these days its also suggested by "hard-money gold-bug men" (Austrian school) some of whom have been interviewed by Eric King. Some of these people are leading thinkers, so I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss it. Its simply not true that a commodity basket can only be comprised of things from the mineral kingdom.
like i said, i dont doubt that they have value, and obviously i think theyre a commodity - but they cannot be money. if the US were 15000000000000 grains of wheat in debt, theyd grow it. that is worst then fiat currency - ANYONE can grow it.
Murray Rothbard in "A History of Money and Banking in the United States" (2002) says, "In the sparsely settled American colonies, money, as it always does, arose in the market as a useful and scarce commodity and began to serve as a general medium of exchange. Thus, beaver fur and wampum were used as money in the north for exchanges with the Indians, and fish and corn also served as money. Rice was used as money in South Carolina, and the most widespread use of commodity money was tobacco, which served as money in Virginia. The pound-of-tobacco was the currency unit in Virginia, with warehouse receipts in tobacco circulating as money backed 100 percent by the tobacco in the warehouse."
If Murray Rothbard, one of the most respected economists in history, is happy to refer to "fish and corn" serving as "money", then I am happy to defer to his authority. I believe that his chose his words very carefully, fully understanding the meaning of the word "money" when he used it. That anyone can grow rice or tobacco, he would have been fully aware.
mmm....shiney! said:But he also says that "fish and corn" (sic) were too inconvenient in the end to remain as money.
Black_Sun said:mmm....shiney! said:But he also says that "fish and corn" (sic) were too inconvenient in the end to remain as money.
Agreed. The point is that they were money, and most people - unless they knew their monetary history - would probably have denied outright that such a thing could ever have even been possible. History doesn't repeat, but it often rhymes. Hence the idea of a commodity basket replacing the US dollar is again being discussed by some of the smartest guys in the room.
To say that ONLY items 'a', 'b', and 'c', can ever be money, shows a limited imagination; ie: we have tried this once/twice and it did not work, therefore, henceforth for all eternity, it can NEVER work again under any circumstances... A presumptious call.
Albert Einstein: "Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we now know and understand, while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand."
nowaydude said:Like I said earlier, bartering has its limitations. Also, having 'money' backed by a commodity anyone can grow in their backyards will not work. Money needs to be earned through hard work, innovation etc - it cant simply be grown.
mmm....shiney! said:nowaydude said:Like I said earlier, bartering has its limitations. Also, having 'money' backed by a commodity anyone can grow in their backyards will not work. Money needs to be earned through hard work, innovation etc - it cant simply be grown.
Lol, you ever tried to grow anything?
mmm....shiney! said:nowaydude said:Like I said earlier, bartering has its limitations. Also, having 'money' backed by a commodity anyone can grow in their backyards will not work. Money needs to be earned through hard work, innovation etc - it cant simply be grown.
Lol, you ever tried to grow anything?
Black_Sun said:Mmm....shiney! I'm guessing you live in a cold climate?
pmbug said:Trichter said:... but money supply will contract dramatically.
How? The Fed is trapped. Their balance sheet is filled with crap/toxic assets. Where does the credit/money destruction come from? Who's taking the loss(es)?