A hypothetical scenario

D

dagsgarrett

Member
Silver Stacker
what could be achieved if stackers pooled all their precious metal holdings together, that would work out financially beneficial to all members or participants, or have some form of influence or power.
 
dagsgarrett said:
what could be achieved if stackers pooled all their precious metal holdings together, that would work out financially beneficial to all members or participants, or have some form of influence or power.
Click to expand...


A sphincter says what?*



Edit to add


*with apologies to Waynes World
 
One would assume it would be quite difficult to manage from a legal perspective, although putting difficulties aside for a moment what ideas can people come up with.

My initial thoughts are a along the lines of,

New currency backed by holdings
Bank or financial services
Purchase income producing asset/s
Purchase an Island and allocate individual titles to participants
 
@dagsgarrett, I think this may be where Karsten and Beckman are heading as an alternative to democratic society, ie communities that develop according to the wants and desires of people who freely choose to associate together without government mandates.
 
mmm....shiney! said:
@dagsgarrett, I think this may be where Karsten and Beckman are heading as an alternative to democratic society, ie communities that develop according to the wants and desires of people who freely choose to associate together without government mandates.
Click to expand...


You want to see the the end of the world as we know it begins? Well, first off it's the internet and the unfiltered exchange of ideas / knowledge

Then it moves on to these sort of videos (sans MSM filtering)

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhJ6H9vlEDA[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bD61YFxUga4[/youtube]

DYODD
 
Nugget, I don't as a rule rule watch videos because i prefer to read, so I won't be watching whatever that is you posted. If you want to type out some transcript I'd be more than happy to read it and discuss it with you. Correct me if I'm wrong, but do you have a problem with the unfiltered exchange of ideas? I'll admit I'm confused by what you are trying to say.
 
mmm....shiney! said:
Nugget, I don't as a rule rule watch videos because i prefer to read, so I won't be watching whatever that is you posted. If you want to type out some transcript I'd be more than happy to read it and discuss it with you. Correct me if I'm wrong, but do you have a problem with the unfiltered exchange of ideas? I'll admit I'm confused by what you are trying to say.
Click to expand...


Your confusion would be my fault because I do lack the ability to convey my thoughts / idea's. Meh, I know it's an issue

I don't have a problem with unfiltered exchange of idea's. Rather my issue is with the opposite.


Until very recently I was totally ignorant of the issues surrounding the above video's. I've long since gone off Alex Jones. Nothing personal it's just that I've got other things on my mind that demand my attention.

Still, this is my take on the above video's. My take being an Aussie viewing YouTube video's of an American issue, the video's of course being slanted to an agenda (that I'm not fully aware of)..


1. A federal agency (bureau of Land Management - BLM) with 200 employees somehow managed to put together a SWAT team.

2. Some BLM employees had "Police" brazened on them. They aren't Police. They've broken the law right there

3. As I understand it they're (BLM) are trying to seize grazing rights from a family that have held those rights since before the state existed.

4. They are trying to seize it under force of arms - Video "We will shoot you"

5. They were forced to retreat because the citizens refused to back down with words to the affect "Let's start the second civil war right here right now""




FWIW I think the vid's are worth watching. Both video's show the common man forcing armed thugs to retreat.


FWIW pt 2 - the BLM appear to be trying to kick the guy off the land so that a politician can allow a Chinese company to establish a solar farm & have fracking go ahead.


Caveat - I think it's powerful viewing (if your eyes and brain are open) but whatever, I'm in Oz & that's in Nevada USA. May as well be in Dumbasfuckastan
 
Some figures,

To make it into the top 50 countries by total gold reserves you would need the following (approx)

1,170,287 ounces of Gold divided by 100,000 people would equate to 11.7 ounces of gold per person or $16,000 AU each current gold price (approx), only 0.46% of the population of Australia or 1 packed MCG to be rubbing shoulders with the likes of Ukraine, Malaysia, West African Economic and Monetary Union. Perhaps this is something the Principality of Hutt River should be promoting in order to be recognised internationally.
 
make a boat out of it all and lets go fishing.

interesting to note that in times of war and strife and global uncertainty the price of PMS has not only not gone to the moon,. its fallen. i see my precious metal holding now more as ammunition and bait than wealth.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top