We all know about the existing law which states that the Governor General can enact a law which prohibits private citizens from possessing gold - and they would have to hand it all in (like in 1933 in the US) in return for fiat. As if that does not already tell you that they already regard your bullion as effectively theirs, there is another little jewel burried there... Did you know that you are not permitted to travel overseas with your own gold, without first getting permission from the Reserve Bank of Australia? Enjoy your bullion while you still have it, because our repressive regime may act on its self allocated God given right of demanding you hand over your gold ... cos its actually theirs!
Unfortunately, as Peter Spencer found out, for the purposes of section 51(xxxi), property must have been acquired. Hence, the Commonwealth can restrict your use of and access to your property without compensation.
But they CANNOT take your GOLD without compensation on "Just terms" (for any purpose) I doubt the High Court would be game to defy that, this question has been before them many times.
We will go back onto a gold standard - of that i am certain. So the gubmints of the unfree world will then collude together (as they presently do) and confiscate gold en masse before revaluing gold to account for all the worthless fiat hitherto pulled outa their arses. So gold could go from $2000 or $3000 an ounce - before confiscation - to something like $50 000 an ounce after confiscation - and we\'ll be back on a gold standard - but citizens who were wise enough to store their wealth in gold will have been ROBBED of their right to preserve said wealth by the thieving gubmint.
Someone like Glen or Ken tells the ruling party of the day that it absolutely must be done to prevent a massive banking collapse with untold consequences and they all take a vote without an election or other consultation.
I have no link, but was reading some time ago that the 1933 confiscation involved NIL actual knocking on doors or at Safe Custody vaults. ....and that an estimated 30% ignored the order. My bet is they will enforce the Australian miners to sell ALL of their Gold to the RBA first. That will generate about 240 tons a year. And all those 1%ers in Canberra, and their friends, would not like it.
Would it not be easier to nationalise our resources than confiscate individual's holdings? Dont know that the amount us stackers are holding would be worth the effort. India would do ok out of such a move maybe?