Jislizard brings up another good point - Do you have a selling strategy worked out before you actually desire or need to sell? Good to have a plan there too.
Jislizard brings up another good point - Do you have a selling strategy worked out before you actually desire or need to sell? Good to have a plan there too.
^Some commentators have been saying there is a shortage of change (everyday coin) in the USA, some say, banks are hoarding change
and pre-empting a US digital currency.
Myself personally, I'm of the opinion there could well be a return to the Gold standard... and if you divide the total M2 Currency supply currently by the amount of Gold central banks currently hold, you get conservative figures of US$9,000 per oz Gold... and upwards of US$15,000 per oz
In 1913 the dollar-to-Silver ratio was US$2.65 per ounce, but the actual price was about US$0.80 per ounce......
Not a chance.
Completely irrelevant today.![]()
why not a chance? If Governments are forced to go back to a Gold standard (which they could be) those are the figures and Gold will have to be re-valued to back the currency supply.
Why do you think it's irrelevant today?
I also don't believe in the MMT theory working.
Because government's can't be forced to adopt a gold standard, they can only choose to adopt it and they won't because it would mean two things, they'd be revenue constrained and they'd lose national sovereignty over their currency. The only way we'd ever go back to some commodity-backed currency is if we abolish the State.
Because the historical gold/silver ratios were based upon currencies being pegged to a gold standard. So if you do want to look at the ratio you'd only be interested from 1971 onwards, or possibly from 1913 onwards. Before those dates the ratio is now irrelevant to our circumstances.
You probably mean policy decisions based upon MMT being successfully implemented. MM Theory itself is simply an explanation of how our modern monetary system currently operates.
I do not see how the current system can continue to operate under this format as being sustainable. Something will have to give and I think the US stock market is primed to be the first major casualty causing a cascadian affect across the globe. In other words, total meltdown.
You cannot continue to lend to zombie companies to be the driving force of the market through institutional lending. That's nothing more than a false economy. The real economy will get flattened and we will witness major upheaval, civil unrest, social calamities, caused by government intervention and the outcome will be rebellion. I put no trust in governments. That's a good reason to hold gold.
Cheers Markco2
I disagree.
The possibility of going back to the Gold Standard has been under discussion among finance outlets and the mainstream finance media since April. It's not going to be the Politicians decision to go back to the Gold Standard to back the world reserve currency (which will change from the US$ to likely a digital currency from another country, maybe China or Russia), it’s going to be the Market decision. What else is capable of backing the next world reserve currency?...
Gold has historically proven to work as Money, because Gold already proved itself as a viable reserve to back currency. That’s why a lot of Central Banks buy Gold, hold a lot of Gold - and in the case of China, Russia and some other big countries - have been actively increasing their Gold reserves over the last few years... because they are preparing for a return to a Gold-based monetary system that works, instead of this Petro-dollar Fiat system that isn’t and doesn't work.
The politicians don’t want the Gold Standard because it forces them to balance their books better. Voluntarily? Nope. They will most likely be forced into it, in order to regain trust in a digital Fiat currency again. When the global Fiat collapse occurs, what will be the alternative?
One thing is certain - there will be an enormous vacuum and people will be looking for the thing they believe they can trust the most. I guarantee you it won't be any government/bank issued paper or digital currency. Anything like that will be instantly rejected. Most will lean toward the thing that has a proven track-record and is very easy to understand. Politicians won't choose to go back to a Gold standard. They could be forced to go back to a Gold standard. Big difference.
I don't see how the paper-to-Silver and paper-to-Gold ratios on usdebtcock.org are irrelevant at all in these times of extreme Quantitative Easing.
government being an IMF member can not go against that, that gold were surrendered, or be like Venezuela, your gold be given to the opposition leader hand pick by Adamwhy not a chance? If Governments are forced to go back to a Gold standard (which they could be) those are the figures and Gold will have to be re-valued to back the currency supply.
Why do you think it's irrelevant today?
I'm not after an argument, just interested in hearing all views with explanations![]()
government being an IMF member can not go against that,