whinfell said:
I'm interested in this article but it's paywalled. Could you copy a bit or give us the gist?
I looked into Nant a while ago and it seemed there were a LOT of restrictions, weasel clauses and caveats in their offer. The idea of committing $10-30k for a decent promised return but questionable risk status didn't grab me.
(Edit: nevermind, I've found other sources)
A good idea, with poor execution....
Yes, that would sum up the whole of Nant's business, judging by these links:
http://www.smh.com.au/business/whis...batt-who-owes-16-million-20160204-gmmb4f.html
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/busines...y/news-story/acb94114e0944a78b4412b07615e667b
Looks like the whole enterprise is all about one man's greed.. and ego.