damien192x
New Member
What kind of BS is this, opening up a graph, drawing lines, circling things, and then telling people the price could go up or down?
No shit. Now pick one.
No shit. Now pick one.
damien192x said:What kind of BS is this, opening up a graph, drawing lines, circling things, and then telling people the price could go up or down?
No shit. Now pick one.
pmstacker said:damien192x said:What kind of BS is this, opening up a graph, drawing lines, circling things, and then telling people the price could go up or down?
No shit. Now pick one.
TA and mathematical equations based around machine learning are all you have to make money on the markets (legitimately of course). Using algorithms like linear regression on massive vector dataset of stocks is how the big banks make billions of dollars. Does that sh*t crash markets ... yeh it does, does it work all the time ... na it doesn't, but if you happen to be making the trades during the 90% where there isnt a massive downturn, make millions 3/5 days you trade for the bank, you wil start to believe you have just hit the alpha ..
There are patterns in the data if you know what kind of parameters to pick and if you have the right equations ... they are the same equations that google uses to guess what word you might be typing even before you type ithow does google know from the trillions of page when you type something what you actually mean, how does it know to put it on the first page, when you start typing in the box how from the trillions of pages does it start to guess your word and put it in the dropdown just under the search bar.
Using TA and quant analysis methods you can do the same thing with stocks and pick the most likely outcome (which with google search) im sure many times it is correct, but also at times might also be incorrect too ... but looking at how many times google gets it right vs how many times it gets it wrong, if you had a method that could get you the same odds with stocks im sure you would use it![]()
ReturnToZero said:pmstacker said:damien192x said:What kind of BS is this, opening up a graph, drawing lines, circling things, and then telling people the price could go up or down?
No shit. Now pick one.
TA and mathematical equations based around machine learning are all you have to make money on the markets (legitimately of course). Using algorithms like linear regression on massive vector dataset of stocks is how the big banks make billions of dollars. Does that sh*t crash markets ... yeh it does, does it work all the time ... na it doesn't, but if you happen to be making the trades during the 90% where there isnt a massive downturn, make millions 3/5 days you trade for the bank, you wil start to believe you have just hit the alpha ..
There are patterns in the data if you know what kind of parameters to pick and if you have the right equations ... they are the same equations that google uses to guess what word you might be typing even before you type ithow does google know from the trillions of page when you type something what you actually mean, how does it know to put it on the first page, when you start typing in the box how from the trillions of pages does it start to guess your word and put it in the dropdown just under the search bar.
Using TA and quant analysis methods you can do the same thing with stocks and pick the most likely outcome (which with google search) im sure many times it is correct, but also at times might also be incorrect too ... but looking at how many times google gets it right vs how many times it gets it wrong, if you had a method that could get you the same odds with stocks im sure you would use it![]()
That is the biggest pile of crap I have ever read.
Big banks make money with algo's by finding small mispricing and arbitrage quicker than any natural person can, not by using TA to guess where the markets are going in the short/medium or long term.
All short, medium and long term trades are made with fundamental analysis and privileged information. Banks don't put millions on the line because a line is pointing up.
Google knows what you're about to type next based on what's trending, not that stuff you just made up.
Anyone that works in finance will tell you charting is full of crap. No-one got rich by drawing lines on a chart. Have a chat with any broker about TA and they'll roll their eyes and laugh at you.
You talk like you're one of the big boys at a big bank but you sound more like a kid who just read a lot of stuff on Google.
pmstacker said:ReturnToZero said:pmstacker said:TA and mathematical equations based around machine learning are all you have to make money on the markets (legitimately of course). Using algorithms like linear regression on massive vector dataset of stocks is how the big banks make billions of dollars. Does that sh*t crash markets ... yeh it does, does it work all the time ... na it doesn't, but if you happen to be making the trades during the 90% where there isnt a massive downturn, make millions 3/5 days you trade for the bank, you wil start to believe you have just hit the alpha ..
There are patterns in the data if you know what kind of parameters to pick and if you have the right equations ... they are the same equations that google uses to guess what word you might be typing even before you type ithow does google know from the trillions of page when you type something what you actually mean, how does it know to put it on the first page, when you start typing in the box how from the trillions of pages does it start to guess your word and put it in the dropdown just under the search bar.
Using TA and quant analysis methods you can do the same thing with stocks and pick the most likely outcome (which with google search) im sure many times it is correct, but also at times might also be incorrect too ... but looking at how many times google gets it right vs how many times it gets it wrong, if you had a method that could get you the same odds with stocks im sure you would use it![]()
That is the biggest pile of crap I have ever read.
Big banks make money with algo's by finding small mispricing and arbitrage quicker than any natural person can, not by using TA to guess where the markets are going in the short/medium or long term.
All short, medium and long term trades are made with fundamental analysis and privileged information. Banks don't put millions on the line because a line is pointing up.
Google knows what you're about to type next based on what's trending, not that stuff you just made up.
Anyone that works in finance will tell you charting is full of crap. No-one got rich by drawing lines on a chart. Have a chat with any broker about TA and they'll roll their eyes and laugh at you.
You talk like you're one of the big boys at a big bank but you sound more like a kid who just read a lot of stuff on Google.
OK i read it of google what ever, i dont get into arguments about this cause i know what i know. You might be looking at one example of using arbitrage which is fine. But there are MANY different ways to use ML to determine prices of stocks. There are ways to classify stocks and trade based on classification, there are ways to do arbitrage (which you said and which is right) and you can use basic algos to work out the price of stocks and options in future. I have worked with these algos on data sets and seen how its done. I have used them to work with other data sets also such as finding patterns in peoples shopping habits ... a misprice represents its self as a certain pattern also.
When someone uses TA and says heads and shoulders pattern its because some PHD determined that when this pattern arises in the charts in many cases it means that X will happen. NOT everyone can understand why a head and shoulders pattern may lead to a certain outcome from its core equations but its a template that people who do TA can use. Like when someone gives you a forumla to find something. You dont need to know how they got it all you need to know is that it just works.
WHY would a certain pattern mean a certain thing IF there wasn't a long line of train examples of seeing that pattern result in similar outcomes most of the time ?
ReturnToZero said:pmstacker said:ReturnToZero said:That is the biggest pile of crap I have ever read.
Big banks make money with algo's by finding small mispricing and arbitrage quicker than any natural person can, not by using TA to guess where the markets are going in the short/medium or long term.
All short, medium and long term trades are made with fundamental analysis and privileged information. Banks don't put millions on the line because a line is pointing up.
Google knows what you're about to type next based on what's trending, not that stuff you just made up.
Anyone that works in finance will tell you charting is full of crap. No-one got rich by drawing lines on a chart. Have a chat with any broker about TA and they'll roll their eyes and laugh at you.
You talk like you're one of the big boys at a big bank but you sound more like a kid who just read a lot of stuff on Google.
OK i read it of google what ever, i dont get into arguments about this cause i know what i know. You might be looking at one example of using arbitrage which is fine. But there are MANY different ways to use ML to determine prices of stocks. There are ways to classify stocks and trade based on classification, there are ways to do arbitrage (which you said and which is right) and you can use basic algos to work out the price of stocks and options in future. I have worked with these algos on data sets and seen how its done. I have used them to work with other data sets also such as finding patterns in peoples shopping habits ... a misprice represents its self as a certain pattern also.
When someone uses TA and says heads and shoulders pattern its because some PHD determined that when this pattern arises in the charts in many cases it means that X will happen. NOT everyone can understand why a head and shoulders pattern may lead to a certain outcome from its core equations but its a template that people who do TA can use. Like when someone gives you a forumla to find something. You dont need to know how they got it all you need to know is that it just works.
WHY would a certain pattern mean a certain thing IF there wasn't a long line of train examples of seeing that pattern result in similar outcomes most of the time ?
And you know what happens when any sort of "pattern" forms? Something fundamental comes out, like the Europeans announcing that they are going to nuke Greece. What happens to your patterns then?
Markets are driven by fundamentals and sentiment, not by charts. You can't chart fundamentals or sentiment. The macro environment has no rules. Rather than sitting in the drivers seat and wondering why a car is going one way, you are trying to build the road for the car to drive on based on it's current trajectory - the moment it turns for no apparent reason, you will lose. At least in the seat of the car you can guess.
Have you also noticed a certain pattern with people who swear by TA? Yeah, none of them are rich. Explain that.
Does that sh*t crash markets ... yeh it does, does it work all the time ... na it doesn't, but if you happen to be making the trades during the 90% where there isnt a massive downturn, make millions 3/5 days you trade for the bank, you wil start to believe you have just hit the alpha ..
pmstacker said:ReturnToZero said:pmstacker said:
OK i read it of google what ever, i dont get into arguments about this cause i know what i know. You might be looking at one example of using arbitrage which is fine. But there are MANY different ways to use ML to determine prices of stocks. There are ways to classify stocks and trade based on classification, there are ways to do arbitrage (which you said and which is right) and you can use basic algos to work out the price of stocks and options in future. I have worked with these algos on data sets and seen how its done. I have used them to work with other data sets also such as finding patterns in peoples shopping habits ... a misprice represents its self as a certain pattern also.
When someone uses TA and says heads and shoulders pattern its because some PHD determined that when this pattern arises in the charts in many cases it means that X will happen. NOT everyone can understand why a head and shoulders pattern may lead to a certain outcome from its core equations but its a template that people who do TA can use. Like when someone gives you a forumla to find something. You dont need to know how they got it all you need to know is that it just works.
WHY would a certain pattern mean a certain thing IF there wasn't a long line of train examples of seeing that pattern result in similar outcomes most of the time ?
And you know what happens when any sort of "pattern" forms? Something fundamental comes out, like the Europeans announcing that they are going to nuke Greece. What happens to your patterns then?
Markets are driven by fundamentals and sentiment, not by charts. You can't chart fundamentals or sentiment. The macro environment has no rules. Rather than sitting in the drivers seat and wondering why a car is going one way, you are trying to build the road for the car to drive on based on it's current trajectory - the moment it turns for no apparent reason, you will lose. At least in the seat of the car you can guess.
Have you also noticed a certain pattern with people who swear by TA? Yeah, none of them are rich. Explain that.
I did .....
Does that sh*t crash markets ... yeh it does, does it work all the time ... na it doesn't, but if you happen to be making the trades during the 90% where there isnt a massive downturn, make millions 3/5 days you trade for the bank, you wil start to believe you have just hit the alpha ..
And dude I TOTALY agree with you, in good times Quant Analysis works charms, im not advocating that its the best thing to use over all tho, when did i say that ?! i was just stating that there are fundamentally *logical* reasons WHY drawing a line might MEAN a certain outcome, just trying to help the original poster understand that drawling a line isn't just drawing a line, there is a logical REASON behind it thats all.
As a matter of fact i always question how the banks trade even now, you cant model ben Bernanke in a computer well you could if you coded an entity that just started adding zero's to the worlds money supply LOL .. but in all seriousness you cant model whats happening in the world today cause these are uncertain times, but say during 2000 - 2007 i can see how it was possible and how a CRAP load of traders could have made a CRAP load of money doing it ..
ReturnToZero said:pmstacker said:ReturnToZero said:And you know what happens when any sort of "pattern" forms? Something fundamental comes out, like the Europeans announcing that they are going to nuke Greece. What happens to your patterns then?
Markets are driven by fundamentals and sentiment, not by charts. You can't chart fundamentals or sentiment. The macro environment has no rules. Rather than sitting in the drivers seat and wondering why a car is going one way, you are trying to build the road for the car to drive on based on it's current trajectory - the moment it turns for no apparent reason, you will lose. At least in the seat of the car you can guess.
Have you also noticed a certain pattern with people who swear by TA? Yeah, none of them are rich. Explain that.
I did .....
Does that sh*t crash markets ... yeh it does, does it work all the time ... na it doesn't, but if you happen to be making the trades during the 90% where there isnt a massive downturn, make millions 3/5 days you trade for the bank, you wil start to believe you have just hit the alpha ..
And dude I TOTALY agree with you, in good times Quant Analysis works charms, im not advocating that its the best thing to use over all tho, when did i say that ?! i was just stating that there are fundamentally *logical* reasons WHY drawing a line might MEAN a certain outcome, just trying to help the original poster understand that drawling a line isn't just drawing a line, there is a logical REASON behind it thats all.
As a matter of fact i always question how the banks trade even now, you cant model ben Bernanke in a computer well you could if you coded an entity that just started adding zero's to the worlds money supply LOL .. but in all seriousness you cant model whats happening in the world today cause these are uncertain times, but say during 2000 - 2007 i can see how it was possible and how a CRAP load of traders could have made a CRAP load of money doing it ..
in 2000 - 2007, traders made a CRAP load of money by just going long and gearing it. That's all they needed to do, nothing else. Charts aren't needed to make returns during that time.
The good old days aren't coming back, intervention is only going to get worse and markets will probably get even more volatile. If you want to make money now, either play the fundamental macro game by waiting for all of this to blow over, or if you got the time, play the fundamental micro game and pick long term winners.
I've had a lot of experience with proprietary quant & qual models (I maintained one), bloomberg "PHD" indicators, I've even had GSJBW build me quant reports for 20k a pop - none of them work.
MelbBrad said:TA doesnt work in a rigged market.
pmstacker said:ReturnToZero said:pmstacker said:I did .....
And dude I TOTALY agree with you, in good times Quant Analysis works charms, im not advocating that its the best thing to use over all tho, when did i say that ?! i was just stating that there are fundamentally *logical* reasons WHY drawing a line might MEAN a certain outcome, just trying to help the original poster understand that drawling a line isn't just drawing a line, there is a logical REASON behind it thats all.
As a matter of fact i always question how the banks trade even now, you cant model ben Bernanke in a computer well you could if you coded an entity that just started adding zero's to the worlds money supply LOL .. but in all seriousness you cant model whats happening in the world today cause these are uncertain times, but say during 2000 - 2007 i can see how it was possible and how a CRAP load of traders could have made a CRAP load of money doing it ..
in 2000 - 2007, traders made a CRAP load of money by just going long and gearing it. That's all they needed to do, nothing else. Charts aren't needed to make returns during that time.
The good old days aren't coming back, intervention is only going to get worse and markets will probably get even more volatile. If you want to make money now, either play the fundamental macro game by waiting for all of this to blow over, or if you got the time, play the fundamental micro game and pick long term winners.
I've had a lot of experience with proprietary quant & qual models (I maintained one), bloomberg "PHD" indicators, I've even had GSJBW build me quant reports for 20k a pop - none of them work.
Im sure the good old times are not coming back either, even in silver i remember when a two dollar drop was considered a *dip* , now its just normal. When i stay up at night to get the first few hours opening of the AMEX all i use charts for are to see what the price is of whatever im looking at nothing else. Im either trying to find the latest article to see what the fed is going to do, what just happened in europe after a meeting or any other type of fundamental information. Based on that, i click few buttons or i don't click a few buttons then go to bed ...
Dirtbikepilot said:went to edit my last post and created a new one. You can have this for free as well :lol:
RomanControl said:as of the time of this post, the us dollar is tanking, Id like to convert my silver to us dollars temporarily in this situation then wait for the exchange rate to slingshot back and convert back.
Is there a way to do this without being under the eye of the government?
Example of a real-time, multi-threaded application written in c#, that utilizes machine learning to predict the next percent change in stock price of Microsoft based on the last actual trade. It utilizes the Encog neural network framework (v1.1), as well as IQFeed (real-time market data) and zedGraph. Note, the actual application updates faster than what is displayed in the video (this current video is limited to the video capture software's sample rate). In addition, the neural network has only been trained for demonstration purposes.