Martin Armstrong article - The Silver Crash of 2011?

[dragonslive]

If my interpretation is correct, he does not seem to be very bullish on silver in the next few years with a best case scenario being if we bottom out June 13th/14th then silver may exceed $54 by 2013. See "The Silver Crash of 2011?" http://www.martinarmstrong.org/files/The Silver Crash of 2011 05-06-2011.pdf

His outlook on gold may be much more bullish, depending on the price and trend on June 13th. See "How and When - Outlook for Gold" http://www.martinarmstrong.org/files/how and when 03-01-2011.pdf

http://www.martinarmstrong.org/economic_projections.htm

 

[hiho]

problem is using technicals on this silver bull market aint that accurate as the latest crash was due to artifical influence, and one would expect any further bull runs to be curtailed by the Ponzi scheming fraudsters

 

[THUCYDIDES79]

Love Armstrong !!!

Reading article now

 

[Nukz]

Depends which tech analysis you use also each can foster different predictions, Gann/fibbonacci ect. tech analysis is sometimes useful in identifying double top's ect but in my experiance i find it's rarely correct and found myself more relying on fundamentals rather than analysis.

 

[Big A.D.]

problem is using technicals on this silver bull market aint that accurate as the latest crash was due to artifical influence, and one would expect any further bull runs to be curtailed by the Ponzi scheming fraudsters

Are the margin hikes really an "artificial influence" or are they actually "normal market forces"? The COMEX is the market in question and the rules for dealing in the market can change. Rule changes in the form of margin hikes are a known risk.

This reminds me of that teenage stock "manipulator" a few years ago who would simply post stock recommendation on his website. People took his recommendation, bought stock and the price went up.

The SEC could never actually explain what the difference was between what the kid was writing and what the Wall St Journal was writing, nor why his stock picks were "manipulation" and the WSJ analyst's stock picks were "normal market forces".

 

[Nukz]

This reminds me of that teenage stock "manipulator" a few years ago who would simply post stock recommendation on his website. People took his recommendation, bought stock and the price went up.

What about the rivkin report lol that was a classic!

 

[grinners]

This reminds me of that teenage stock "manipulator" a few years ago who would simply post stock recommendation on his website. People took his recommendation, bought stock and the price went up.

What about the rivkin report lol that was a classic!

Link? For stories on either