SilverSanchez
Active Member
Brent Cook says that he looks for the fatal flaw - I believe HAV is a good example (ironically they use Cook's graph in their presentation)
http://www.havilah-resources.com.au
This company says they are meaning to bring their Portia deposit to production through an open pit mine
They say they have a JORC resource of 720,000t @ 3.1g/t Au for 72,000 ounces
They DONT have a reserve because their resource is only INFERRED - you cant apply economic modelling to an inferred resource (minimum needed is an INDICATED resource)
Hence they cannot legitimately call their resource 'ORE' - ore is a concentration of material taht can be mined now at a profit (HAV cant proove this)
THEREFORE - they will have problems financing this, they might jerk some sophisticated investors to supliment finding and mine the shareholders/market
They use a Au price of A$1750per ounce and their details of expenditure is completely void of a COST PER OUNCE because THEY COULD NOT HAVE DONE A feasability study of an inferred resource.
YET they tick off the pre-feas and the feasability study on their project status - no bankable feasability study!
This company is a joke - lots going on here that stinks
I have been looking through their material for answers to my questions - and they play the language game - talking up their project, but having nothing
AND THEY KNOW IT - becaus ethey have 'qualified persons' as defined in the JORC code ON THEIR BOARD!
Im NOT saying you cant make money on this company
I AM saying there is no reason i can see to trust this resource will ever become a reserve, and if they are doing this with one project - what will they do with the others?
These directors also have another spin off company with geothermal properties - stay away from them as well IMO.
http://www.havilah-resources.com.au
This company says they are meaning to bring their Portia deposit to production through an open pit mine
They say they have a JORC resource of 720,000t @ 3.1g/t Au for 72,000 ounces
They DONT have a reserve because their resource is only INFERRED - you cant apply economic modelling to an inferred resource (minimum needed is an INDICATED resource)
Hence they cannot legitimately call their resource 'ORE' - ore is a concentration of material taht can be mined now at a profit (HAV cant proove this)
THEREFORE - they will have problems financing this, they might jerk some sophisticated investors to supliment finding and mine the shareholders/market
They use a Au price of A$1750per ounce and their details of expenditure is completely void of a COST PER OUNCE because THEY COULD NOT HAVE DONE A feasability study of an inferred resource.
YET they tick off the pre-feas and the feasability study on their project status - no bankable feasability study!
This company is a joke - lots going on here that stinks
I have been looking through their material for answers to my questions - and they play the language game - talking up their project, but having nothing
AND THEY KNOW IT - becaus ethey have 'qualified persons' as defined in the JORC code ON THEIR BOARD!
Im NOT saying you cant make money on this company
I AM saying there is no reason i can see to trust this resource will ever become a reserve, and if they are doing this with one project - what will they do with the others?
These directors also have another spin off company with geothermal properties - stay away from them as well IMO.