Gold backed $, Petro backed $, now

Some valid points about the shortcomings of fiscal and monetary policy in bringing about a better life for all, but to suggest that the failure of Bretton Woods was by deliberate design is a big stretch.

Moving toward the end of the video if money is anchored to anything apart from faith in the government (as he postulates eg gold, energy, crypto) then all we are going to do is set ourselves up for failure again. Convertibility was the very undoing of the Bretton Woods system as consumer demand for imports surpassed the USA's capacity to offer convertibility for gold in exchange for the large amounts of USD reserves exporting nations had amassed. This is contrary to what he maintains. If the US hadn't abandoned Bretton Woods, austerity would have been the only choice and hardship would've been rampant. Of course nowadays hardship is far more widespread than it has been for decades and that is also due to fiscal and monetary policy failure, and while that failure may not be deliberate by design, its design was destined because our policy makers implemented faulty theories. A nation must continue to issue ever increasing amounts of currency if its citizens are to lead lives that are wealthier and of a higher quality than previous generations because demand can never be totally never satisfied and nor should it.

I'm going to go out on a limb here and argue that currency is a consumable. Some of it eventually gets destroyed which creates shortages so therefore more must be printed to take its place to cater for growing populations and our ever-expanding needs and wants.

And I don't think that any pattern exists. :)
 
Again he's got valid points which also align with my position that modern fiscal and monetary policy as implemented by our politicians and mainstream economists has failed. I wouldn't go so far to say that it was designed to deliberately fail though which was the central thesis of the previous video.

As far as the rest of his video goes I gave up listening to Marxists years ago eg Neil Postman because they all have the shits with the modern world and this guy is no different.
 
There's nothing wrong with consuming, it's not evil or some nefarious plan to enslave us, it's how we've gone about satisfying our needs and wants since the beginning of time.

What we consume and how we go about satisfying our consumption is the critical point. A point the likes of Postman and that Professor in the 2nd video don't address.
 
I agree with you to a point.
Nothing wrong with consuming if you don’t know or care of the cause and affects that impacts others negatively.
I don’t have the answers for humanity and those in charge look to have no clue either, we just keep on keeping on, rolling with the punches
 
I don’t have the answers for humanity and those in charge look to have no clue either, we just keep on keeping on, rolling with the punches

And the solution is not just to simply adopt a commodity based currency.

I haven't got easy solutions, but there are a stack of things our governments could do to improve things. The problem with many of them though is that they run the risk of getting voted out of office for implementing them.
 
I remember all the sov cit / prepper nut jobs for years in here convinced we were going to get a gold backed currency again tomorrow

so it has moved to crypto now -- interesting seems to consider with the news that boomers are now piling into crypto currently seems a few of them are a few cans short of a six pack and need stronger meds
 
interesting seems to consider with the news that boomers are now piling into crypto currently

Report reveals Baby Boomers are now jumping at crypto with whopping 723 per cent surge
They might already own most of the housing, but now new data has revealed where else baby boomers are throwing massive amounts of cash.

https://www.news.com.au/finance/cul...e/news-story/803494e94286b8994d6e78501e05dea1

The concentration of wealth at the top is a huge concern. Especially as all that they had to do was get a loan, buy assets, hold them long enough then get another loan on the equity built up in their assets and hoover up more. Of course the banks are just as much to blame for this as the government.

Over the past decade, large business R&D investment has declined by 24%, or $2.9 billion. Despite well-established links between R&D, productivity, and economic growth, Australia has not taken the necessary decisive action to improve R&D investment.

https://www.bca.com.au/unlocking_australia_s_r_d_potential#:~:text=Over the past decade, large,action to improve R&D investment.

Despite accommodative monetary policy, investment remained at low levels, reaching a historically low share of non-mining output (Figure 1).

figure-1.gif

https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/rdp/2023/2023-03/capital-flows-investment-and-productivity.html
 
Back
Top