1for1 said:
goldpelican said:
Still waiting to see evidence of a fake ASE with a legitimate date.
Consider for a moment, if the counterfeits can make ASEs with dates ranging from 1900 all the way through to 1908, what is stopping them from making a 2000 coin?
1for1 said:
Yep me to, we have had a recent thread on this where i went and spent a couple of hours checking out the claim, the 1904 you (Yennus) have was the only eagle that could remotley be considered a fake (did it fool you i wonder? could it?), the only other two i found were marked "copy".
The 19xx fake ASEs are just as hard to distinguish than fake pandas in my opinion. Since being in China, I haven't come across many fake Pandas - I guess the counterfeiters primarily export fake Pandas overseas (via Ebay), as almost any Chinese person would probably recognize a fake Panda (like we can detect fake ASEs). As Jim Rogers says "Do your homework."
Compare this fake panda with this real panda. The fake panda stands out immediately.
[imgz=http://forums.silverstackers.com/uploads/675_fakepanda.jpg]
[/imgz] - Fake
[imgz=http://forums.silverstackers.com/uploads/675_2009-chinese-silver-panda-i0-yaun-999-gem-bu-1-oz-ba63d.jpg]
[/imgz] - Real
It's a similar case with the ASEs. Unless you are familiar with ASE's, you will be unlikely to suspect a fake ASE. Same with any other decently counterfeited coin, unless you are familiar with the genuine articles (Morgans, Pandas, Pesos, etc), and have done your homework, you are just as likely to get cheated.
1for1 said:
The real concern in the silver bullion market is the chinese panda coins, imo they are overpriced and unless your a panda expert the secondary market is riddled with fakes in most years.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion, and as a collector of both Eagles and Pandas (as well as a range of other numismatic and bullion items), I think you are wrong on both counts (please don't be offended - this my opinion, and I could be 100% wrong... though I think I'm 100% right... at least on this).
1. Chinese Pandas are not overpriced, indeed, I believe that they are currently undervalued, and I would assume Jim Roger's would also agree with this.
http://www.numismaster.com/ta/numis/Article.jsp?ad=article&ArticleId=20484 If Jim Rogers felt confident to spend $270,000 on Chinese Pandas on record, I am sure he agrees that Pandas are a good investment. Not failing to mention, that At least 1.4 billion people are automatically inclined towards Pandas.
[imgz=http://forums.silverstackers.com/uploads/675_jimrogersbuyspandas.jpg]
[/imgz]
2. The market is not riddled with fakes. Ebay may be riddled with fakes, but genuine Pandas can be found from many genuine dealers, all over the world (I can personally testify to this). I have purchased genuine Pandas not only from the China mint, Shanghai dealers and individuals, but also from individuals in Australia. Here are just a few American websites that list Chinese Pandas:
www.apmex.com
http://www.yellowriverrarecoins.com/shopping.asp?cat=164
http://www.northeastcoin.com/inventory.jsp
1for1 said:
I feel very safe buying ASE's online. The same could not be said for pandas (the only truely copied silver bullion)
I feel safe buying ASE's and Pandas online... just not from Ebay, or some guy with a dodgy reputation on Ebay. Do your homework, and you will find that there are many safe online dealers to purchase pandas from.
1for1 said:
Yennus - You were mentioned in this previous discussion as a Panda expert, read discussion
http://forums.silverstackers.com/to...sing-the-value-of-this-collection-for-me.html
Many thanks to those who consider me a Panda expert. I'm not an expert (or supplier, or dealer)... I'm just an Aussie with an affection for Pandas, a Panda fan. I think the Pandas are the BEST bullion and investment coin on the market today - but I still collect ASEs, PerthMint coins, Masterpieces in Silver, etc. After doing my homework, I came to the conclusion that Pandas are by far the best investment. Many people may/do disagree, but they are entitled to their opinions too. I respect that.
1for1 said:
thanks for your efforts to eduacate
1for1
Thanks for your thoughts.
In conclusion. So far I've just been discussing my opinions based on personal and public knowledge. But one undeniable
FACT. If you had purchased a standard 2009 Pandas in 2009 instead of a standard ASE in 2009 (not talking about Proofs, PCGS, etc), the value of your standard 2009 Panda would today be more than double the current value of a standard 2009 ASEs. (check it out at APMEX... 2009 Pandas are worth more than double the price of 2009 ASEs).
As Jim Rogers says, "Do your homework." PandaCollector has a really good online subscription which I highly recommend for those interested in getting deeper into Pandas. I think Pandas are the BEST coin investment to be in - but that's just my opinion.
Thanks for your interest.
PS> I don't get any kickbacks from PandaCollector and I also have to pay for my subscription to his Panda Pricepedia.

[a worthwhile investment]