Altima said:Oh wow. Down she goes!
(Thank goodness for semi-numismatics!)
It's never cheap, nor expensive.thatguy said:Silvers cheap OR IS IT??!?!
wrcmad said:It's never cheap, nor expensive.thatguy said:Silvers cheap OR IS IT??!?!
Just market price.![]()
Sonic said:So yeah...noob question, whatever. Why would it be better to own semi numis? Like in what way specifically is it more beneficial if you're mainly looking at spot price for buying and selling?
sammysilver said:I think it's important to put this drop in silver spot within the bounds of the space time continuum. If you bought an ounce 3 1/2 years ago for $50, it was an asset that gave you succour for that time. Now a new ounce bought today at say, $25 will give you additional succour. Anytime between the first purchase and the recent purchase, that first ounce has been there to provide you with alternate funds should you need them.
Granted that the price has dropped, but the succour has been constant. Eighteen months ago, most Cypriots lost half their money during a three week bank holiday, ask those holding PMs how they faired compared to the mainstream?
With silver, you do not need to watch your back, your stack has your back.
dccpa said:sammysilver said:I think it's important to put this drop in silver spot within the bounds of the space time continuum. If you bought an ounce 3 1/2 years ago for $50, it was an asset that gave you succour for that time. Now a new ounce bought today at say, $25 will give you additional succour. Anytime between the first purchase and the recent purchase, that first ounce has been there to provide you with alternate funds should you need them.
Granted that the price has dropped, but the succour has been constant. Eighteen months ago, most Cypriots lost half their money during a three week bank holiday, ask those holding PMs how they faired compared to the mainstream?
With silver, you do not need to watch your back, your stack has your back.
Less than two years ago, silver was about 34, so the loss would be about half. Are you asking us to pick which corpse is the least dead?![]()
dccpa said:sammysilver said:I think it's important to put this drop in silver spot within the bounds of the space time continuum. If you bought an ounce 3 1/2 years ago for $50, it was an asset that gave you succour for that time. Now a new ounce bought today at say, $25 will give you additional succour. Anytime between the first purchase and the recent purchase, that first ounce has been there to provide you with alternate funds should you need them.
Granted that the price has dropped, but the succour has been constant. Eighteen months ago, most Cypriots lost half their money during a three week bank holiday, ask those holding PMs how they faired compared to the mainstream?
With silver, you do not need to watch your back, your stack has your back.
Less than two years ago, silver was about 34, so the loss would be about half. Are you asking us to pick which corpse is the least dead?![]()
sammysilver said:dccpa said:sammysilver said:I think it's important to put this drop in silver spot within the bounds of the space time continuum. If you bought an ounce 3 1/2 years ago for $50, it was an asset that gave you succour for that time. Now a new ounce bought today at say, $25 will give you additional succour. Anytime between the first purchase and the recent purchase, that first ounce has been there to provide you with alternate funds should you need them.
Granted that the price has dropped, but the succour has been constant. Eighteen months ago, most Cypriots lost half their money during a three week bank holiday, ask those holding PMs how they faired compared to the mainstream?
With silver, you do not need to watch your back, your stack has your back.
Less than two years ago, silver was about 34, so the loss would be about half. Are you asking us to pick which corpse is the least dead?![]()
No, I'm asking you to think about as to why you stack. If you bought and ate a banana last month for $2, and bananas today cost $1, should you not have eaten the first banana?
dccpa said:sammysilver said:dccpa said:Less than two years ago, silver was about 34, so the loss would be about half. Are you asking us to pick which corpse is the least dead?![]()
No, I'm asking you to think about as to why you stack. If you bought and ate a banana last month for $2, and bananas today cost $1, should you not have eaten the first banana?
You stack so that you can eat silver? And did you fondle the silver before you ate it?If not, then why wouldn't you buy it later for half price? And is Australia so expensive that a banana costs $1?
My superannuation took a hit of not much less than that size and hasn't shown much fortitude in rebuildingdccpa said:Less than two years ago, silver was about 34, so the loss would be about half. Are you asking us to pick which corpse is the least dead?![]()