2020 Collapse

Discussion in 'Markets & Economies' started by TreasureHunter, Dec 8, 2019.

  1. shinymetal

    shinymetal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,753
    Likes Received:
    560
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    victoria
    There is no other way to explain this apart from illegal ballot stuffing.
    Bringing hidden votes out after counting had stopped and there was no media or observers around to monitor the counting, sometimes putting them through the machines multiple times.
    It's on video.
    Arguing there was no fraud at this point makes you look like an idiot.


     
    Last edited: Dec 6, 2020
    STKR likes this.
  2. Golden Stash

    Golden Stash Well-Known Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2020
    Messages:
    306
    Likes Received:
    313
    Trophy Points:
    63
  3. ParanoidAndroid

    ParanoidAndroid Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2015
    Messages:
    922
    Likes Received:
    523
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    S.E.Q
    shinymetal and STKR like this.
  4. STKR

    STKR Well-Known Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2019
    Messages:
    1,137
    Likes Received:
    1,982
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "No, Georgia election workers didn’t kick out observers and illegally count ‘suitcases’ of ballots"

    "Lead Stories and Georgia Public Broadcasting reported that while the state’s law allows partisan observers to watch, it does not actually require that they be present for ballots to be counted."

    Technically the counting of ballots isn't illegal, but the means in which they were counted may very well have been.


    It's all in the wording. What are they actually refuting?!?

    That observer were kicked out, rather than being instructed to leave, or influenced to leave under the belief that no more ballots were to be counted.

    The terminology of what the ballots were stored in, e.g "Suitcases".

    And whether the counting of said ballots were "illegal" with the absence of observers.

    It's a typical strategy of bias fact-checking sites like PolitiFact to narrow in on mute points, while dismissing key facts by not even mentioning them.

    Why did the observers leave?
    Why were the ballot boxes stored under the table, untouched, until the rest of the election workers had left?
    Who were the ballots from?
    Who were the ballots for?

    There's enough red flags in this situation to warrant an investigation.
     
    shinymetal likes this.
  5. mmm....shiney!

    mmm....shiney! Well-Known Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    Messages:
    21,286
    Likes Received:
    4,122
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    昆士蘭
    Read the article.
     
  6. STKR

    STKR Well-Known Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2019
    Messages:
    1,137
    Likes Received:
    1,982
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, I did. Do you think observer's would've left if they believed there was more counting to observe?

    The entire article offers little substance.
     
  7. mmm....shiney!

    mmm....shiney! Well-Known Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    Messages:
    21,286
    Likes Received:
    4,122
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    昆士蘭
    That’s also answered in the gpb.org article linked.
     
    Golden Stash likes this.
  8. GoldenEye

    GoldenEye Well-Known Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2014
    Messages:
    1,474
    Likes Received:
    1,389
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    I can't understand why people still believe that Fact Checkers are there to keep us informed, when most of them are there to actually spread misinformation. :(

    Candace Owens is SUING the "Fact Checkers"



    Who Will Fact Check the Fact Checkers?

     
    ParanoidAndroid and STKR like this.
  9. mmm....shiney!

    mmm....shiney! Well-Known Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    Messages:
    21,286
    Likes Received:
    4,122
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    昆士蘭
    Fallacy of relevance.

    Questioning the motive of an individual/organisation is not evidence that supports the claim that the election result is fraudulent.
     
    Golden Stash likes this.
  10. STKR

    STKR Well-Known Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2019
    Messages:
    1,137
    Likes Received:
    1,982
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I cannot find the article you're referencing.

    I was simply underscoring the inadequacies, biases and tactics used by the legacy "fact-checkers".

    The structure, wording and focus of one fact-checking article, and how they conveniently bypass key points by not even mentioning them. Each article should be assessed independently. It makes no difference if certain points were addressed by seperate "fact-checing" entities.
     
  11. mmm....shiney!

    mmm....shiney! Well-Known Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    Messages:
    21,286
    Likes Received:
    4,122
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    昆士蘭
    Golden Stash likes this.
  12. Golden Stash

    Golden Stash Well-Known Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2020
    Messages:
    306
    Likes Received:
    313
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Can someone show me the court hearing where this fraud was proven??
    Dont even think Rudy took this event to court.
     
  13. STKR

    STKR Well-Known Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2019
    Messages:
    1,137
    Likes Received:
    1,982
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ah yes, I see. Same Sh!t different smell. Strategically refuting the term "Suitcase", sharing the opinions and views of Gabe sterling- rather than facts, and interestingly revealing the boxes in question were emptied, ballots placed on the table, put back into the boxes for some reason, and processed in the absence of media, observers and additional electoral staff.

    Nothing to see here...
     
  14. GoldenEye

    GoldenEye Well-Known Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2014
    Messages:
    1,474
    Likes Received:
    1,389
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    I didn't mention election results, only that Fact Checkers are notorious for spreading misinformation.
     
  15. mmm....shiney!

    mmm....shiney! Well-Known Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    Messages:
    21,286
    Likes Received:
    4,122
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    昆士蘭
    Like Trump and Giuliani.
     
    GoldenEye likes this.
  16. GoldenEye

    GoldenEye Well-Known Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2014
    Messages:
    1,474
    Likes Received:
    1,389
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    You need to be wary of all politicians, lawyers, media and fact checkers. :)
     
    STKR and mmm....shiney! like this.
  17. sgbuyer

    sgbuyer Well-Known Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    May 25, 2018
    Messages:
    3,372
    Likes Received:
    1,815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Singapore
    MSM is 90% propaganda. It's a well known fact that reporters and journalists are paid (direct monetary kickbacks, trips to massages, etc) to write propaganda, so most "reports" are actually advertisements. I've personally seen it happen and it's very very common.

    Better to find out facts from the ground, from neighbours, from colleagues, from relatives over a dinner meal. They will tell you stuff that you can't find from anywhere on the Internet.
     
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2020
    GoldenEye likes this.
  18. alor

    alor Well-Known Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2011
    Messages:
    10,402
    Likes Received:
    2,710
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Pulau Alor ;)
  19. alor

    alor Well-Known Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2011
    Messages:
    10,402
    Likes Received:
    2,710
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Pulau Alor ;)
    the one that lied and cheat is blasting it lol Pompeous
     
  20. shinymetal

    shinymetal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,753
    Likes Received:
    560
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    victoria
    It was in a state legislature hearing I believe,
    They only got access to the tape right before the hearing, that was the first time it had been seen publically!
    What more is required to prove the claim, it's on its face what it is. Some bitch wheels in a covered table in the morning, later that night after a "water pipe burst" (overflowing toilet in another part of the building) they kick media and poll watchers out, then retrieve the suitcases of ballots from under the table and count them, sometimes running them through the machine 3 times.
    Out right, blatant in your face ballot stuffing.
    And if they did it there, I'd bet my mother's life it isn't the only place.
     

Share This Page