2020 Collapse
- Thread starter TreasureHunter
- Start date
He is Absurdistan's minister of truth (therefore: truth sayer) with a degree in marxism.
I have nothing against the guy, just that he is strongly limited. And he himself has "issues", being a drug addict. And his speeches are foamy band-wagon truth sayings. I had one of his books, but it was sooo much below my level, that I gave it away to someone
Dude, if Jordan Peterson is "sooo much below your level" you must be quite the intellectual
He's pulled apart so many of society's "sacred cows" that to pigeon-hole him would be disingenuous
Pre-Covid...2018
Singapore is part of the WEF. Doubt this model works for China.
The WEF's "platform" and the CCP's "model" for society seem to pretty much go hand in glove
From the earlier quoted piece;
What are the chances, that all the "leaders" are WEF stooges? Sort of goes beyond the realm of "coincidence"
seems like a conspiracy...not a theory
Last edited:
The WEF's "platform" and the CCP's "model" for society seem to pretty much go hand in glove
Yes, they are the same kind, run by elites and capitalistic, but the CCP isn't the WEF even if they work with each other.
TreasureHunter
Well-Known Member
When the Fed starts raising interest rates and the EUR starts losing purchase power with the massive inflation unraveling in Europe, people will buy crypto.
In Lebanon, Turkey, Iran and Venezuela, they all bought crypto, when the economy started shaking.
If Bitcoin (and the alt coins) end their (probably much deeper) correction, then cryptos will probably not stay low for long. Probably Bitcoin will hit 100,000 $ - my guess, before 2025.
In Lebanon, Turkey, Iran and Venezuela, they all bought crypto, when the economy started shaking.
If Bitcoin (and the alt coins) end their (probably much deeper) correction, then cryptos will probably not stay low for long. Probably Bitcoin will hit 100,000 $ - my guess, before 2025.
Any concrete evidence the WEF isn't controlling/influencing the CCP? Or just beliefs...over here, the majority is still in denial about it but it's getting far too obvious
If they are "working with each other"...
Any concrete evidence the WEF isn't controlling/influencing the CCP? Or just beliefs...over here, the majority is still in denial about it but it's getting far too obvious
If they are "working with each other"...
The control goes 2 ways. The US is also partially controlled by the WEF elites. No matter what happens, China will work with the WEF, even if there are disputes on issue such as Taiwan, but Taiwan itself is nothing compared to the more than 100 years of cooperation between the Chinese empire and European banking elites.
That's why I say Russia will be in trouble once China becomes the superpower, because eventually China will be the WEF. This is a destiny that cannot be changed because while the destiny of a person can be changed, just as there is no pill of immortality that cure dementia or parkinson, it's impossible to change the destiny of more than a billion people, especially so for an empire like China that cannot be destroyed. This is because China isn't just a dictator, it's a religion and a religion cannot be destroyed.
It's very important to know that Europeans and China and the Americans are not geopolitical enemies, even if wars had been fought in the past over trade and power. In all relationship, there will be fights. The wife fights with the husband over power and money. If the husband doesn't fight back, he will become henpecked. But in the end, they are still on the same ship. China and WEF are on the same ship.
TreasureHunter
Well-Known Member
From the moment we speak of "husband", he has signed half of his fortune to "wife". No marriage = no sharing your assets = no fight over money/power
The US is married to China.
The EU is married to Russia.
(by this, I mean: interconnected)
And the party that generally has the most powerful blackmail position (e.g. has more rights) wins!
Marriage only benefits the woman and regardless who divorces or who has right, the divorce itself only benefits the woman as well.
Interesting take on things
Many "religions" have been destroyed over the years, usually by the disillusioned
The elephant in the room is the impact of the WEF on, and in, every "government" in the world
Once people wake up to the games being played, the whole construct falls apart
You really do dribble a lot of shit.
That’s a conspiracy theory with no basis in fact. It’s interesting that the only discussions on the internet regarding the WEF attempting to take control of governments is in dubious websites prone to peddling misinformation eg Armstrongeconomics etc.
Actually this discussion around the WEF reminds me of the discussion around the failed TPP on this forum a few years ago. In that case the TPP was scuttled by nationalists pushing their populist agendas. Now we're left with a situation where governments can ride rough-shot over the rights of businesses and agreements previously entered into meaning that there is less security when it comes to doing business across borders.
Those names mentioned just goes to show that even the WEF has had its failures.
That lacks credibility, Kim Iversen's opening comments just recycle the fallacy that the WEF is intent upon redistributing wealth to the "elites" whoever they may be with her comment "You will own nothing". Sounds like another far-right mouthpiece to me talking absolute rubbish.
Show me where Klaus Schwab said that a policy of the WEF is to ensure that people will own nothing and be happy. Show me where it is in their agenda or policy statements because the only time I see it mentioned as WEF policy is by far-right media groups/news sources. I need to see the primary sources otherwise it's simply a conspiracy theory despite Kim Iveresen's unproven claims that it's not.
Last edited:
Mind you I've got about as much expertise on the topic as Kim Iversen, my agenda is different to hers though. I'm a pro-market libertarian along the lines of "The Wealth of Nations" when it comes to economics and trade, she's a nationalist who I would say would rather see a return to mercantilism and is happy to see the US ignore all those "little" problems with China like genocide, or Hong Kong or Tibet.
