Takeovers

Discussion in 'Stocks & Derivatives' started by LovingtheSilver, Sep 4, 2013.

  1. LovingtheSilver

    LovingtheSilver Active Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2010
    Messages:
    1,372
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Perth
    A Chinese company has offered to acquire Perilya Ltd for 35 cents per share... Has spiked to 31 cents at the moment. Do share prices tend to go over offered price during takeovers? Thinking about buying under 35 cents, if that is what they will eventually go for.
     
  2. SilverSanchez

    SilverSanchez Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2011
    Messages:
    2,653
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Yeah saw that, do libs have a forign investment policy? They like or dislike China taking over Australia??
     
  3. LovingtheSilver

    LovingtheSilver Active Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2010
    Messages:
    1,372
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Perth
    Not too sure, pretty much the same as Labor. I grabbed a small amount for fun, see if hype takes it any higher.
     
  4. SilverSanchez

    SilverSanchez Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2011
    Messages:
    2,653
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Warren Buffet loves friendly takeovers, makes heaps of money on 'em because they usually discount the offer (in this case the offer is 0.35 and its trading at 0.315) he would make an easy 10%.

    In this case it needs to be aproved by the investment board.
     
  5. Old Codger

    Old Codger Active Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    May 13, 2011
    Messages:
    4,782
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    38
    If a company is worth buying at 35c a share, then it may well attract a counter offer from someone, possibly at another 10% or so on top of the original. As an offer 10% over market is probably a bit low.

    Worth a gamble I suppose.

    From memory, when BNSW took over the CBA they offered about 35% over market value on the day. No counter offer then.


    OC
     
  6. SilverSanchez

    SilverSanchez Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2011
    Messages:
    2,653
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Hostile Takeovers Gone Bad: Steve Todoruk
    By Henry Bonner ([email protected])
    Sprott Global Resource Investments Ltd.

    Key points: Juniors that are likely to be taken over typically see a significant increase in trading volume just prior to takeover negotiations. For "takeover plays" in our portfolio, this can be an early signal that we are right.

    How do big mining companies and small exploration companies hammer out takeover deals with the takeover premiums that shareholders expect? What happens when negotiations go wrong?

    Steve Todoruk, an Investment Executive at Sprott Global Resource Investments Ltd, has nearly two decades of experience in the field at mining projects. Steve walked me through a recent takeover example that shows how the game is played, and why volume typically rises substantially in the period preceding takeover talks.

    Two years ago, after making a new high grade uranium discovery in central Canada, a junior named Hathor Exploration Limited (we have discussed this company in a previous issue) was the subject of a hostile takeover attempt by the world's largest uranium mining company Cameco Corporation.[1]

    "Hathor's new discovery was located in Cameco's backyard the Athabasca Basin," Steve explains. "Cameco watched as the resources discovered by Hathor grew larger and larger."

    After a few years, Cameco made a takeover offer for Hathor. But management at Hathor rejected the proposal, deeming it insufficient for the value of their deposit.[2] Cameco opted to take the offer directly to the Hathor shareholders with a hostile takeover.

    "Hathor management quickly made the case to shareholders that Cameco's offer was a fraction of the value of Hathor's high grade uranium deposit," says Steve. They also set out to attract a competing bid.

    They succeeded in finding a competitor to Cameco: three weeks later, Rio Tinto (the second largest mining company in the world, 12 times larger than Cameco in terms of market cap as of 3 September, 2013) made a higher offer for Hathor.[3] A bidding war ensued, which Rio Tinto eventually won, outbidding Cameco to acquire Hathor. Prior to entering the Hathor bidding war, Rio Tinto bought 9.9% of the shares of Hathor in the open market which is the usual amount of shares a major will buy so they do not need to disclose that they are an insider to the company.

    "The loss of Hathor was a major blow to Cameco," Steve continues. "Prior to the bidding war, Rio Tinto had no presence in the Athabasca Basin, leaving Cameco as the only big player in the region. With this development Cameco will face competition when a new deposit surfaces in the basin."

    In the Hathor story, it appears that, unlike Rio Tinto, Cameco entered negotiations without first securing the maximum possible interest without becoming insiders. Was this a mistake?

    "If they had bought shares of Hathor before the bidding war, they would have had leverage in the company when it came to a takeover negotiation. But it doesn't appear that they made this move at the time, and that may have cost them Hathor."

    Big mining companies gain a strategic position before making a takeover bid by acquiring shares in the open market.

    Such a position would have helped Cameco avoid being beaten out by a bigger competitor: "From a business point of view, buying shares early on makes sense for majors. Shares bought in the open market are less expensive than if they were to make a takeover bid at a premium. These shares also serve as a hedge against losing the takeover battle. They can sell their cheap shares into the takeover bid for a profit."

    Steve believes Cameco will not make the same mistake twice and will very likely buy up shares of companies it is interested in taking over in the future. Steve believes this is especially necessary given their new competition in the basin, Rio Tinto.

    "In the Athabasca Basin, Cameco will face competition from Rio Tinto, and possibly Areva or Denison Mines," Steve believes.

    Therefore, heavy buying in certain companies could provide clues about what major mining companies expect to do in the future. Presumably, each of the companies interested in acquiring a particular junior will take a 9.9% stake beforehand.

    Especially in a competitive region like the Athabasca Basin, high volumes of trades in juniors with decent resources could be a sign that majors are gearing up for an aggressive takeover negotiation.

    "We don't just look for high volumes in order to find takeover targets. We typically invest early on, at least several months or years before the majors would start to get interested. But when we own companies as 'takeover plays,' high volumes of trading can indicate that we are on the path of being proven right."

    Questions? Contact Steve Todoruk.

    Steve Todoruk worked as a field geologist for major and junior mining exploration companies after he graduated with a B. Sc. in Geology from the University of British Columbia, in 1985. Steve joined Sprott Global Resource Investments Ltd. in 2003 as a Senior Investment Executive.

    To contact Steve, e-mail him at [email protected] or call him at 1.800.477.7853.

    Read online >



    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    [1] Mining Weekly: Cameco's $520m Hathor bid could spur uranium takeover frenzy

    [2] Mining.com: Hathor board rallies the troops against 'predatory, opportunistic' bid

    [3] Financial Post: Rio Tinto boosts Hathor takeover bid



    Article from Sprott
     

Share This Page