SMSF property loans a bomb

Discussion in 'Superannuation' started by JulieW, Jul 20, 2014.

  1. nonrecourse

    nonrecourse Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2011
    Messages:
    1,487
    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Melbourne Australia
    There is the crux where we really differ. I don't believe the laws are written to protect people from themselves but rather are written to look like the regulators are doing something. Just like the CBA investment scam, Storm financial, etc. By attempting to guess and putting in place more hand holding you destroy the essence of what is so great about Self Managing. As a trustee everyone now has to sign off before they start that the are aware of the responsibilities. The whole annual audit process for what is a very small non compliance yield says it all. Regulators justifying their jobs rather than applying the laws that are in place. Demanding more and more regulation is destroying the flexibility and that is exactly what the Industry and retail funds want.

    As someone who was a high school drop out its not about how smart you are. It is about repetition and never letting go. To quote Calvin Coolidge "Nothing in the world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not; nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not; the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent.

    From my childhood to now the most fiscally literate people I have come across are not scholars but rather salt of the earth individuals with a whole lot of street smarts and basic common sense. I eventually did go back to University in my 30's but it did not teach me how to be an investor. In fact I would argue the more education you have the more unlikely you will be fiscally literate

    What I see is an agenda to if not stop then severely restrict SMSF's from borrowing money to invest in REAL ESTATE. If that happens the industry and retail scam artists will be able to relax and carry on scamming their suckers (members). I think purchasing a residential property in an SMSF is a poor investment why? because the bleeding hearts have given the tenants an open ticket to screw the landlords. But its not up to the government or the pink fairies at the bottom of the garden to tell me or anyone else what property to buy. So your happy to see people scammed in the share market by the wall street lizards but you can't understand where I'm coming from?

    From my posting above there is approximately 15,000 residential properties of which probably a hand full will go belly up due to bad advice. That is called investors risk get over it an move on.

    Why not let them be hung out to dry? Why hand over the management to idiots called investment advisers who don't have a clue about property and live off other peoples earnings and of whom most are wage slaves.

    Kind Regards
    non recourse
     
  2. nonrecourse

    nonrecourse Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2011
    Messages:
    1,487
    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Melbourne Australia
    The dirty harry of commercial property investing eh? I like that :p To answer your question I will answer it with an Ernest William Henley poem entitled Invictus

    Out of the night that covers me,
    Black as the Pit from pole to pole,
    I thank whatever gods may be
    For my unconquerable soul.

    In the fell clutch of circumstance
    I have not winced nor cried aloud.
    Under the bludgeonings of chance
    My head is bloody, but unbowed.

    Beyond this place of wrath and tears
    Looms but the Horror of the shade,
    And yet the menace of the years
    Finds, and shall find, me unafraid.

    It matters not how strait the gate,
    How charged with punishments the scroll.
    I am the master of my fate:
    I am the captain of my soul.

    Dirty Harry did his homework. He knew his market. Would I start right now? With the internet and the wealth of free information available today? Bloody oath I would. No prior knowledge just a hunger to be the master of my fate and be captain of my soul.

    People think that the REAL ESTATE market is one big market, its not. Its hundreds of thousands of little markets each one unique. Most people are cowards when it comes to investing. Fear is simply ignorance because you have no control. In order to control your fears you need to take control. You cannot banish fear it has its place in your investment road map but you do need to manage it. Black swans are events that come out of left field and king hit you. Black swan events happen to people who have no fear.

    That is one of the reasons I evolved from being an atheist to believing in god.

    God doesn't determine my faith I do. I strive to be captain of my soul.

    Kind Regards
    non recourse
     
  3. col0016

    col0016 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2011
    Messages:
    2,466
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Australia, Melbourne
    Well I really like that poem, cheers.
     
  4. Big A.D.

    Big A.D. Well-Known Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2009
    Messages:
    6,278
    Likes Received:
    186
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Sydney
    Yes, since this seems to be the main point of contention, I'm not talking so much about regulating what trustees do as buyers but more about how various industries behave as sellers.

    And yes, I agree that the big managed funds hate the fact that SMSFs are draining their funds under management and depriving them of fees, but they do have a place: getting gouged an extra $1000 a year by a managed fund is better than losing $100k of a dud property deal put together by a slick, unlicensed real estate "consultant" intent on earning fat commissions.

    That's not an endorsement of big, managed funds but just because they can act badly doesn't mean the system should be made easier for people to rush off and invest their retirement savings in something worse.

    I certainly agree with you that common sense and experience offer the best chances of success and in most cases those things can't be formally taught, but again, a lot of people are stupid and ignorant and they get one shot at saving for retirement. Yes, we can be all morally superior about how they should have read the fine print or should have known better than to believe someone calling themselves an investment adviser wasn't really acting in their best interests (because they don't need to according to section 7, subsection (b) of the blah blah blah Act, as amended), but you and me and all the other taxpayers out there are going to be picking up the pieces when things go wrong. We'll be stuck paying for the pensions of those people who commit no crime in investing unwisely, and some smart aleck salesman will be kicking back and enjoying spending all those commission fees.
     
  5. mmm....shiney!

    mmm....shiney! Administrator Staff Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,680
    Likes Received:
    4,442
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You know what the solution to that problem is? ;)
     
  6. Big A.D.

    Big A.D. Well-Known Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2009
    Messages:
    6,278
    Likes Received:
    186
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Sydney
    Well, if you're feeling as misanthropic as usual, I'd guess it might be something along the lines of "screw 'em".
     
  7. mmm....shiney!

    mmm....shiney! Administrator Staff Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,680
    Likes Received:
    4,442
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I had to google "misanthropic". And if you think I'm misanthropic then you have seriously ill-judged me. :/

    It's a broken record i know, but if we remove the taxation system we remove the shared risk - then you won't have to concern yourself with your tax $ going towards picking up all the bits and pieces and supporting someone on the pension. You can then campaign freely about educating people in financial literacy from an altruistic platform as opposed to an enforced shareholder's platform.
     
  8. mmm....shiney!

    mmm....shiney! Administrator Staff Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,680
    Likes Received:
    4,442
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And as far as being misanthropic goes, in the main I would class those who are supportive of government control and a powerful State as displaying far more hatred and distrust of human species than a Libertarian. In fact, the core concept of Libertarianism is as far removed from misanthropy as any political system can be.
     

Share This Page