The biggest weakness regarding the Scaffold system was outted on Lateline (IMHO) Just because a company has value doesnt mean the market recognises that value (or ever will recognise it in a time frame that is reasonable if at all) Given that as true Just because the company has an historical value - that number is only valid until its released - after that its an historic number Given that - there is a fallacy on the foundation for this strategy Past performance does not ensure future returns.... ie it (Scaffold) is no more or less sure than any other analysis ------------------------------------------------------ The guy challenging Rodger on lateline, nailed him in my opinion. Rodger Montgomery should put all his Scaffold data into Scaffold and find out what IT's intrinsic value is Scaffold's value is only as high as the returns it generates - when analysing an investment system you never want to look at its successes untill you have accounted for all its failures.
