Government Eyeing Super changes

Discussion in 'Markets & Economies' started by Slam, Apr 20, 2012.

  1. jpanggy

    jpanggy Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Messages:
    1,668
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Oh my god ..... would be near anarchy, everyone wants to control the govt and no consensus can ever be reached.

    Hell, they will even fight to the death on what to eat.

    Imagine Yky on parliament x 100 for every different want and need.
     
  2. SilverSanchez

    SilverSanchez Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2011
    Messages:
    2,653
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Melbourne
    You know basically you have socialists or marxists - sex party and other idiotic parties like that are WORSE than the greens and labor - if they got in they would make it a nightmare and be gunning for anarchy.

    You may not like em but but you need people who have an ethic of traditional morality, not a party who is wanting more freedom to do things currently illegal.
     
  3. Byron

    Byron Guest

    +1000%

    For traditional values there is really only 1 choice - the Christian Democratic Party.

    I urge everyone to have a read of their platform, and make up their own mind.

    2nd choice would be Katter's Party although the only negative is that he wants a "big population" Australia, which is something i am against.

    Family First is simply a front for Labor. Same with Sex Party etc. These are set up to siphon more votes to Labor.

    As for Super, once we have enough we will set up a SMSF and look into buying a property with the money.
     
  4. Big A.D.

    Big A.D. Well-Known Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2009
    Messages:
    6,278
    Likes Received:
    186
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Sydney
    I'm sorry, but this is a list of the Sex Party's policies:

    http://www.sexparty.org.au/index.php/policies

    Does anyone here see any batsh*t crazy stuff there am I the only one that thinks that is actually quite a reasonable list of things for citizens to expect from their government?

    The common theme at the Set Party seems to be "It's my choice and/or none of your bloody business".
     
  5. Slam

    Slam Well-Known Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    1,294
    Likes Received:
    49
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Au
    Yep, you forgot 2 more things:

    - Flood Levy
    - Private Health Insurance Means test, rebate cut back.

    Surplus at any cost right? at the cost of 20% unemployment?

    This could be the start of the downturn, buckle up people. Gillard will be put down as the worst prime minister in Australia.

    Slam
     
  6. KMGeneral

    KMGeneral Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2012
    Messages:
    258
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Sydney
    Admittedly I'm a little angry with politicians as a whole at the moment, mainly because of NSW Labor but can't we just (metaphorically) take them all out the back and shoot them, then start from scratch?
    I know it would be a lot of work to get everything back up and running, but is it an option?
     
  7. richietheb

    richietheb New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2010
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Australia
    I'll be emailing Katter and suggest he'd be the next Prime Minister if he dumps the big Australia (population) idea.

    The more people, the more we need to share what politicians have already squandered.

    A growing population is good for nothing, there is absolutely nothing to gain from it.. i.e. there are no benefits. Only sacrifice.

    It's the biggest scam imposed on the dumbest voters on the planet.
     
  8. jparrie

    jparrie Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2011
    Messages:
    757
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Australia
    I just love the socialist moronic reasoning behind this proposed new Super tax tweak. According to the unions, someone on the top tax rate has an unfair advantage over people on a lower tax rate because they get a greater rebate.

    While technically correct, they conveniently forget to mention the fact that those on higher tax rates already pay far more tax as a proportion of their income than does a person on a lower tax rate. (I'm talking PAYE, not business owners).

    Plus the fact that union members don't stand to gain a thing through this, but they can rub their hands together with much glee and pat themselves on the back when they see high earners get screwed yet again.

    How the hell is a high earner supposed to save and maintain a reasonable standard of living in retirement anyway when all they can save is a poxy $25k per year without getting screwed by the tax man?

    I have never known a Government like this, ever. Take, take, take. Waste, waste, waste.
     
  9. CriticalSilver

    CriticalSilver New Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2010
    Messages:
    2,639
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Australia
    And you think that statement makes sense? Or are you trying to be ironic?

    Actually, my favourite anti-population parties have policies that exclude your procreation and the elimination of your lineage from the gene pool. :rolleyes:
     
  10. CriticalSilver

    CriticalSilver New Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2010
    Messages:
    2,639
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Australia
    Why is it always "we"? Like a psychopath/politician appropriating the collective noun to gain empathy and legitimise their goosebrained ideas.

    There is nothing short of a global financial, political and social catastrophe that will get a start from scratch. Fortunately for you, all you need to do is wait for that. It is well on the way. :lol:
     
  11. Wout

    Wout New Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2011
    Messages:
    502
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Australia
    Ive said before lets kill two birds with one stone, kill off all the scum sucking politicians and give their jobs to the boat people... solved!
     
  12. richietheb

    richietheb New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2010
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Australia
    I think you're trying to be a bit too clever there Gino.
     
  13. nonrecourse

    nonrecourse Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2011
    Messages:
    1,487
    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Melbourne Australia
    Your facts are seen through rose coloured glasses mate. The three stooges Oakeshott Windsor and Bandt sided with the bitch who said there would be no carbon tax under a government I lead. She then reneged on the pokies deal and for good measure through fair work Australia subverted the prosecution of Craig Thomson and to top it off we now have allegations the speaker trying to slip his slipper into one of his underlings:rolleyes:

    Lovely bunch that hard labour mob. We are not going to have to worry about a double disolution to get rid of the carbon tax because Queensland, NSW and West Australia in the Senate elections will get over 50%...it won't be a land slide it will be a tidal wave. Like the Queensland election the hard labour mob are going to need tony's nod because they won't have a quorum in the house of representatives.

    As the saying goes feeling lucky punk?

    Kind Regards
    non recourse
     
  14. nonrecourse

    nonrecourse Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2011
    Messages:
    1,487
    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Melbourne Australia
    My kids thought the sex party was a big joke until I sat them down and showed them that a vote for the sex party would ensure sexually transmitted debt....the preferences went to the hard Labour mob and the green faries at the bottom of the garden.

    I advised them how to vote below the line and encouraged them to show their friends so if they did vote for the sex party their preferences flowed to who they would really prefer lead the country.

    The common theme of the sex party is if it moves $crew it. Unfortunately that is exactly what did happen we got Julia.

    Kind Regards
    non recourse
     
  15. Yippe-Ki-Ya

    Yippe-Ki-Ya New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2011
    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    The Land of Guilty by Default
    First of all - the Sex Party is simply a proxy set up by the Labor Party - all their votes go to the ALP by default (it's in their preferences setup).

    Not sure what you're on about traditional morality etc - but as true as God made little apples - none of the big government parties have any!

    Have a read and lean something mate

    http://www.down-with-power.com/
     

Share This Page