CGT minimisation of shares

Discussion in 'Stocks & Derivatives' started by smk762, Mar 2, 2015.

  1. smk762

    smk762 Active Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2014
    Messages:
    1,255
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Westralia
    I'm relatively new to this game, and was hoping one of the sagacious traders here could confirm/deny a hypothetical for me...

    Assuming I buy $5000 of shares in company A, and $5000 shares in company B. Assume brokerage to be $20 for simplicity.

    Option 1
    Company A does well, and 3 months later the shares are worth $6000. Company B has fallen and it's shares are now worth $4500.
    I sell shares in Company A, $1000 profit is realised. As shares were held for less than a year, the full amount is assessable as a capital gain. Let's pretend my tax rate is 50%, meaning $500 would be due.
    I sell the shares in Company B too, resulting in a capital loss of $500, reducing the overall capital gain to $500, meaning $250 would be due, minus the $80 brokerage for purchase/sale of the shares.
    I immediately re-buy the shares in company B for the same price.
    Net result = shareholding in Company B retained, $170 tax liability.

    Option 2
    18 months later shares in Company A are valued at $6000, and I sell for $1000 profit. Applying the 50% discount for holding more than 12 months, $500 is assessable as a capital gain, meaning at a tax rate of 50%, $250 is due, minus the $40 brokerage.
    I keep my shares in company B, which has rebounded to be worth as much as it was on initial purchase.
    Net result = shareholding in Company B retained, $210 tax liability.

    Is this correct? If so, is this a valid CGT minimisation strategy to overcome the 12 month rule?
     
  2. smk762

    smk762 Active Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2014
    Messages:
    1,255
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Westralia
    Just found this - http://www.news.com.au/finance/mone...es/story-e6frfmdr-1111115524396#ixzz1qmXU0n4f
    And this - http://law.ato.gov.au/atolaw/view.htm?DocID=TPA/TA20087/NAT/ATO/00001

    Guess that means Option 1 could be perceived as a "wash sale" unless I reinvest the cash from sale of Company B into Company C instead or wait long enough before reinvesting in company B.

    Still, interested to hear opinions/experiences with this. I'm not a fan of the 12 month rule, being punished for not locking away my fiat for an arbitrary time period. I welcome any alternative strategies to overcome this punitive limitation.
     

Share This Page