TA is really useless for the stacker. And while i am in the ANTI TA camp as a stacker be me. I can see how mapping trends on a minute, hourly or daily basis can be handy for day traders. While the charts have been on a constant down trend for the last few years i am sure a GOOD TA analyst could find some method to the madness and take advantage of any tends or consistent moves made. I would imagine the TA does not go down well in here because it does not matter to US what happens from one minute to the next. we are more year to year players? At least this is my most humble of views.
I was hoping this might become a true TA discussion thread but there were barely any posts about TA until the inevitable chart bagging post brought the chartists out
This thread is now pointless, TA thread is here in link below, Leon feel free to post your thoughts here http://forums.silverstackers.com/topic-28957-gold-charting-and-gold-ta-chat-page-22.html
the one with 7 posts in the past 6 months ? - gee wonder how I missed it seems the chartists are more interested in arguing the merits of TA with chart baggers than actually discussing TA
I for one like when people guess, and predict stuff. Fun looking back at past predictions. Always appreciate the chart threads as they get smashed with speculations. It's all quite hilarious, really.
This is why I don't bother anymore. ^^^ Your post is hilarious. Not difficult to tell you haven't bothered to look at the mentioned thread, because most of it came to fruition. The only predictions that have been smashed in the years I've been visiting this forum are ones based on fundamentals.
The jury is still out for me on that one. Manipulation is like religion... there are plenty of die-hard believers, and for most of them the belief serves their conscience well in renouncing their errors, mistakes, (sins?). But no one can support the story with evidence of any substance.
I find this statement interesting. It shows that you have little understanding of religion and/or science. I am both very religious and very scientific and find that the more science knowledge I gain the more Creation is proven. If you would like evidence to destroy evolution or prove creation I will gladly continue, but if all you wanted to do was rant than I won't waste either of our time.
Sounds great. Just to let you know I am fairly lazy so if you respond with a long post I won't read it. I feel if you can't explain something in a short paragraph you don't fully understand the concept. In science there is a law known as the conservation of energy that states energy can't be created or destroyed. Therefore, something had to create the energy for your Big Bang or whatever you want to call the start of the universe. I call that higher being God. You can call it whatever you would like.
Well, that was certainly definitive evidence to destroy evolution and prove creation. I hope your investment strategy is based on theories equally conclusive. {chuckle}
I'm more interested in hearing what people say this God actually is, hence the first question about the mind of God.
Hey, I'm perfectly fine with your first question, pretty pertinent in my opinion. It's the second one that surprised me, and that's why I asked.
