When Money Dies: The Nightmare of Weimar Collapse

Guest · Jan 22, 2011

You're not the only one. I'm on Book 10 atm and it's a grind... he really had lost his way after Book 5 I think. Path of Daggers and Winter's Heart were awful for my mind and 10 isn't shaping up to be much either. Although I hear with the new writer on 12 onwards, the progression is much better.

To be brutally honest, the whole series could have been completed in no more than half a dozen books. There were at least 5 or 6 books here that could have been left on the cutting room floor they were so devoid of development.

Dwayne · Jan 22, 2011

No kidding! I own the first 10 books but haven't even bothered to read books 9 and 10 even though I loved the first 5.

Guest · Jan 22, 2011

I'm about halfway through 10 atm and haven't touched it in a few weeks now. It was just so bland and dull, I just can't bring myself to pick it up again. The whole series has so many characters sitting around undeveloped or plotlines left hanging, it's been shitting me to tears in all honesty. I think Robert's brain crapped itself during this period of decline. He'd spend 50 pages introducing a new character or plotline to the story and then just leave it hanging and you'd think, well what was the friggen point of THAT then? :|

In the end, it was just about stretching out the payday as long as possible I think, which honestly never needed to be the case. There were so many opportunities for a different series in that world it wasn't funny. Whilst the lore of his world was definitely a king in fantasy realms, his implementation of it through plot was so clumsy it was staggeringly frustrating at times.

I understand the last book isn't due for release for another year or two yet. I might wait until that's out before I finish the series.

Dwayne · Jan 22, 2011

More recently I've really enjoyed George R Martin's 'A Song of Ice and Fire' series, but he's going a little bit in the same direction as Jordan did - starting to get way too many characters and hanging plotlines... And the next book on the series is a couple of years late now. Still, they've been a great read for the most part.

Hmm. That's a long way from the Weimar republic

Guest · Jan 23, 2011

I bet reading was a very popular past time then though.

dickmojo · Feb 22, 2011

Do the Editors from The Daily Reckoning read this forum I wonder? Today's dealt with this book:

"When Money Dies"
by Chris Meyer

I didn't come up with the phrase, "when money dies," though I like it a lot. The phrase captures an important idea. It is that money I refer to that paper kind issued by governments has a finite life. At some point, it becomes worthless, or dies.

The death of a currency is often a protracted affair. It often takes decades. And as it unfolds, the people who experience it hardly believe it. That is the tale told by Adam Fergusson in his book When Money Dies: The Nightmare of Deficit Spending, Devaluation, and Hyperinflation in Weimar Germany.

First published in 1975, it had been out-of-print for years and much sought after. A used copy on Amazon cost $300 recently.

The book is a history of the death of the German mark in the 1920s. It is also a scary reminder of the devastating effects of inflation and, therefore, a cautionary tale for US central bankers and politicians who play so fast and loose with US Dollar.

If you don't know what happened to the German mark, here's what you need to know from When Money Dies: "In 1913, the German mark, the British shilling, the French franc and the Italian lira were all worth about the same. Four or five of any of these would buy you a US Dollar."

By 1923, you could exchange one shilling, franc or lira for up to 1 billion marks. "Although," Fergusson writes, "in practice, by then, no one was willing to take marks in return for anything. The mark was dead, one million-millionth of its former self. It had taken 10 years to die."

How did that happen?

The short answer is that post-Imperial Germany found itself with a crushing load of debt. Raising taxes or cutting spending is politically difficult in any age. And so it was in Germany. To deal with these debts, Germany chose the path of least resistance. It printed lots and lots of money.

Sounds like the fiscal position the US government finds itself in today. Bleeding deficits with no end in sight. Piling on debt and entitlements with no end in sight. The solution so far? Why, "quantitative easing." In a new introduction, Fergusson writes:

"Money may no longer be physically printed and distributed in the voluminous quantities of 1923. However, 'quantitative easing,' that modern euphemism for surreptitious deficit financing in an electronic era, can no less become an assault on monetary discipline."

But back to Germany...

Eventually, prices started to rise as the mark lost purchasing power. One of the great strengths of the book is the on-the-ground view you get from the people who lived through it. It gives you an unsettling look at German society as it starts to dissolve and as inflation starts to wreak havoc.

It started slowly, with commodity prices starting to rise everywhere. But as the years wore on, prices kept going up in big steps. Soon the damage was remarkable.

In just eight years since 1913, the price of rye bread rose 13-fold. Beef rose 17-fold. Sugar, milk, pork and potatoes went up 23-28-fold. Butter went up 33-fold! And these were official prices. As a practical matter, real prices were often a third higher. It's hard to fathom.

All this brought out the worst in people. Germany became an ugly society, looking for blame. As Fergusson writes: "They picked upon other classes, other races, other political parties, other nations." There was a long list of villains: "the greed of tourists, or the peasants, or the wage demands of labor, or the selfishness of industrialists and profiteers, or the sharpness of Jews or the speculators making fortunes in the money markets."

Erna von Pustau, who lived through it, described what it was like:

"My allowance and all the money I earned were not worth one cup of coffee. You could go to the baker in the morning and buy two rolls for 20 marks; but go there in the afternoon and the same two rolls were 25 marks. The baker didn't know how it happened... His customers didn't know... It had somehow to do with the dollar, somehow to do with the stock exchange and somehow, maybe, to do with the Jews."

As we know what would happen later in Germany, her comments are particularly chilling.

Each year, people thought it couldn't get worse. "And yet things always did, from bad to worse, to worse, to worse," Fergusson writes. "It was unimaginable in 1921 that 1922 could hold any more terrors. They came, sure enough, and were in due course more than eclipsed, with the turn of the following year."

Germany plunged into hyperinflation. The price changes get ridiculous to talk about the numbers so large that they are practically meaningless. Who can imagine paying 500 billion marks for a dozen eggs? It's also interesting to see how society dealt with this breakdown in the currency. The idea of real wealth became very important. Not the kind of wealth denominated in abstract printed marks, but real wealth that one could use.

People bought things. Hugo Stinnes, an industrialist, bought factories, mines, newspapers. The man on the street bought what he could trade. Fergusson ends with a powerful observation:

"In war, boots; in flight, a place in a boat or a seat on a lorry may be the most vital thing in the world, more desirable than untold millions. In hyperinflation, a kilo of potatoes was worth, to some, more than the family silver; a side of pork more than the grand piano."

Despite the awful experience of the 1920s, Germany would repeat its errors again and again. In the 1930s, Hitler would crank up the money presses. By 1948, the reichsmark (which replaced the old mark) died. So Germany created the deutsche mark. Yet it wasn't much better. It lost two-thirds of its purchasing power by 1975.

Such is the fate of all paper money.

I will leave it to you to decide how much relevance Germany's experience has to the US today. I find many alarming parallels.

I would point out, too, that the US dollar has lost 95% of its purchasing power since 1913. And the US dollar is among the best currencies of the last hundred years. That says something about paper currencies, doesn't it?

It's also why staying ahead of inflation is one of the chief tasks of investing.

The monetary puppet-masters at the Fed will have you believe inflationary pressures are inconsequential or a far off mirage.

Don't believe it for a second...

QE2 is humming along with the prospects of a QE3 right around the corner ready to pump untold billions into an already cash-flush banking system.

Now is the time for investors to take action and protect capital from the inflationary pressures building up in our economy.

Regards,

Chris Meyer
For Daily Reckoning Australia

Editor's Notes: Chris Mayer studied finance at the University of Maryland, graduating magna cum laude. He went on to earn his MBA while embarking on a decade-long career in corporate banking. Chris has been quoted over a dozen times by MarketWatch, and has spoken on Forbes on Fox.
Click to expand...

Log in or Sign up

When Money Dies: The Nightmare of Weimar Collapse

Guest Guest

Dwayne New Member

Guest Guest

Dwayne New Member

Guest Guest

dickmojo Member

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

When Money Dies: The Nightmare of Weimar Collapse

Guest Guest

Dwayne New Member

Guest Guest

Dwayne New Member

Guest Guest

dickmojo Member

Share This Page

Useful Searches