Not being enabled - gets abused by spammers and it distracts from thread content. Makes readability difficult.
how about set a rule for that? like 500+ post members can upload some 120*120 size img into their signature? :/
no image signatures period it is unneeded i can tell u now if there is image signatures i will abuse crap out of it with the most bloated animated gifs you can imagine to teach your bandwidth a lesson
Why on earth do we need an image in our signature block? I don't get what purpose it would serve. We can have an avatar which I would have thought gives more than enough scope for a person to express their point of view, interest, or personality.
Agreed to not needing pics for sigs. The last thing I need is to have photobucket/imageshack show up on the corporate firewall 10000 times a day.
Also a no vote. Not only are there some ugly forums out there (and I agree with GP, it's a distraction), it will also slow those of us down on 3G mobile if the number of images grows.