OK I'll say UP only chart indicators I know are moving averages and as there are none on there or even any time frames, I'm just guessing the shorter term MA would still be above the longer term
Oh dear... you said up before? I'll take your first answer. C'mon chartists!... purely a technical based opinion. It's amazing how difficult it really is to eliminate all the rubbish and banter that tends to sway your decisions. :lol:
Thanks finicky. A true T/A analysis. No, it hasn't blown up. It remains tonight exactly as shown in the chart.
Bit hard to say without a time frame. Is this a 10 year chart or a few months? It is bullish, but I wouldn't say buy or not unless I have the time factor.
Appreciate your opinion BiGs. I understand time factor would be a consideration if you were thinking of investing $. But it should not affect your bullish/bearish view of a particular price chart, no matter what the timeframe being represented.
NO! :lol: Barron is being non-committal. His answer is what I'd expect from a chartist. It is also my answer. That is my conundrum.... I was looking for others opinions.
Bullish. Because the price at the end is higher than the price at the start. Im clearly not a chartist, but i thought even chartists needed a timeline, % change/$ scale and volumes? Otherwise its a coin toss. Would also like to know what (if any) news was released at the two big jumps in the first 20% of timescale
But referring to your original question, I wouldn't buy without the time factor xD. If this was a 5 minute chart, it may not be bullish.
OK: 7 bullish (64%) 4 bearish (36%) I know it is a very small sample size, but the group sentiment echoed mine exactly. It is interesting just to know on a level playing field, no bias, no filters. Small white lie...... the chart wasn't exactly a stock, but an exact inversion of this chart:
:lol: interesting point you selected the chart to start at - wonder if response would have been different if we had of seen 12 months more or 12 months less of data.. hmmm..
