Super funds, trusts and big investors will have to pay tax monthly!

Discussion in 'Superannuation' started by Emanance, May 15, 2013.

  1. Emanance

    Emanance Guest

    http://www.afr.com/p/national/budget/super_funds_trusts_to_pay_monthly_4NvctPN8d03gFevYvzPCeL

    I realize Australia's media landscape is still counting the wreckage in the aftermath of last nights ALP kamikaze attack on the Australian working public (budget night 2013); But I'm more than a little surprised I can't find more info on the new monthly 'pay as you go' tax requirements for trusts & superannuation funds. Like does anybody know if this affects SMSF?
     
  2. Emanance

    Emanance Guest

    Oh turtle! Confirmed here: http://www.brw.com.au/p/business/budget_monthly_tax_may_mean_cash_AsoRwq98rDHlkapz7YIWQI

     
  3. AngloSaxon

    AngloSaxon Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2012
    Messages:
    1,779
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Sydney
    More oppression. I knew they did this to trusts, I thought this didn't extend to super trusts, just...other...trusts...

    Thanks for finding this Emanance. Got some reading to do.

    What is annoying is the tax not being paid after the financial year means many cash etc investments will be robbed of some of the capital used to compound all year, and then pay tax. All for the gubbermint to enjoy the marginal benefit of having the money they want to spend each month rather than once a year.

    This whole situation looks like more work for BAS agents. I should go do the course.
     
  4. hiho

    hiho Active Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2011
    Messages:
    7,816
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    South Brisbane
    That counts me out
     
  5. AngloSaxon

    AngloSaxon Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2012
    Messages:
    1,779
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Sydney
    Do Labor understand anything at all?? They're well on the way to putting any business or commercial entity under the size of Woolworths over a barrel with their pants down.
     
  6. Emanance

    Emanance Guest

    This only confirms the ALP's close ties to big finance in Australia. They paint themselves as the party for workers when in reality they are the party for bludgers. Not only do we have a cozy arrangement thanks to labors super reforms for retail superfunds to charge by default unsolicited death & TPD insurance on all newly employer established superannuation accounts, milking billions of dollars from millions of unaware workers. But now also a free kick to banks who will collect interest on the overdrafts of employers everywhere who are forced to employ these banks 'services'.
     
  7. boston

    boston Well-Known Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2009
    Messages:
    3,857
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Australia
    Financially? No!
     
  8. Jislizard

    Jislizard Well-Known Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2011
    Messages:
    7,517
    Likes Received:
    639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Australia
    I wonder how esuper will respond, higher fees?
     
  9. Emanance

    Emanance Guest

    Another new trust deed & $100, hope not.
     
  10. Ageo

    Ageo Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2010
    Messages:
    195
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Australia
    It wont affect Discretionary Trusts etc.. As you need to distribute income to beneficiaries which will be either individuals or companies.

    Super funds and a couple of other trusts like death trusts etc.. will only be affected. But still its going to affect the compounding rates of return.

    Just another way for them to sneak more funds in early.

    Snake would be a nice word to describe them.
     
  11. Byron

    Byron Guest

    WHy? Is you SMSF turning over more than 20 million a year?
     
  12. XB

    XB Active Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2011
    Messages:
    2,058
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Brisbane
    Took a little finding in the Budget papers, but I don't think it will actually affect that many due to the very high threshholds....

    Gravy/Sauce: http://www.budget.gov.au/2013-14/content/bp2/html/bp2_revenue-10.htm
     
  13. hiho

    hiho Active Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2011
    Messages:
    7,816
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    South Brisbane
    huh?

    The inclusion of trusts and self-managed super funds into a requirement that businesses with a turnover above $20 million pay their tax liabilities monthly will not only add an administrative burden and crimp cash flow, but will have knock-on effects throughout the business chain, ACCI chief economist Greg Evans says.
     
  14. AngloSaxon

    AngloSaxon Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2012
    Messages:
    1,779
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Sydney
    The flow on effect of this will be people will arrange their affairs so that they have no trusts/SMSF over the threshold, just numerous trusts of lesser amounts. More work for lawyers, more work for accountants. Less sizeable investments with lower returns may be more beneficial than large investments with the compliance burden and lack of compounding under this unfortunate new tax arrangement.

    The class of people called Sophisticated Investors will still find more elaborate ways around all this. Of course with more work for lawyers and accountants.
     
  15. Emanance

    Emanance Guest

    Does this mean SMSFs with turnover above $20 million are the only funds affected by monthly PAYG?
     
  16. hiho

    hiho Active Member Silver Stacker

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2011
    Messages:
    7,816
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    South Brisbane
    Thats the way I read it.
     
  17. AngloSaxon

    AngloSaxon Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2012
    Messages:
    1,779
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Sydney
    That's the way I read it too.
     
  18. Emanance

    Emanance Guest

    Yay!!! I apologize sincerely for leading anyone astray with my presumptions on this topic.

    Still as AngSax said, these changes can't be good for the bottom line of businesses affected by these changes. In the end this costs us all and will only feed an army lawyers & accountants, just what the world needs more of :rolleyes:.
     

Share This Page