Why would I as for a physical stacker the buy / sell spread on physical means it is still for all practical purposes <-------sideways ------> in AUD terms over the last 3 years. no one here is investing millions in paper silver where the movement we have seen recently would actually matter. like I said I will concede this sideways movement is over once we are @ >$27 aud sustained for at least 2 weeks. as for Sammys prediction -- we are not at $26 AUD yet the fat lady has not sung.
It's not there ... but it's still pretty bloody close. From here on out we're looking at a matter of a few cents here or there, which in my mind, is right on! I'm all ears for his next call.
$25.94 - $26 = "not there yet" $17.95 - $25.94 over last 3 years = "sideways" :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
and how many millions did you make buying at the bottom $18 and selling @ $26? I guess you can retire now on all your silver profits from selling and buying all that physical
you are effectively disputing what audusd was trading at, not whether $26 was bought. The SS charts are line charts that probably show the close price, not THE high.
You're right - the ask was $26.05 and none traded there, hence the corresponding bid of $29.92. But for 5000yrs silver has always 'technically' traded <---sideways---> the chart goes from left to right. So whether it's $5 or $5000, as long as charts are in existance CJ, '''TECHNICALLY'''you will always be right
CJ, keep in mind you keep shifting the goal posts. I recall just recently you stated you only consider it risen once we have a sustained rise and it stays there for at least a few weeks....that was in April when it had already been rising for a few weeks. Whats the new definition? Not looking for an argument...just clarity. Reference - post #52 on this thread, http://forums.silverstackers.com/topic-73087-silver-24-by-greek-easter-page-3.html
