I know this is between Sanchez and SC, but I just want to point something out here: SC certainly did not say it is ok to attack somebody if he is pissed off. In fact, he said quite the opposite (and I know you said that you were changing what he said, but you actually pretty much changed the essence of it to the opposite of what he actually said). He said that sometimes it has happened and he has then apologised. If he thought it was ok, he wouldn't see a need to apologise - the fact that he sees a need to apologise and then actually apologises means quite the opposite of how you seemed to interpret it. People do things all the time that they believe/know are 'wrong'. Isn't this a large part of the basis of Christianity? "I am but an imperfect and sinful human who will continue to sin, but will continually repent and be redeemed". No?